Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The OFFICIAL Shocks vs. Runnin' Utes Game Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
    A logic-filled, perfect poster will never concede anything. He'd rather cut his willy-wacker off than admit to being wrong about something.

    KW, you have a better chance of seeing 10 sober people walking around at a Creighton home basketball game than a concession from the All-Knowing.
    But it's still funny! I'm laughing my butt off over here! LOL
    Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
      Dang it, poking JH4P with a stick is fun, because he's relentless. In fact, I lose to JH4P because he's relentless more than I do because I'm wrong. I get exhausted!

      Now the simple analysis he did clearly shows he's wrong, so he only has one tactic left to win .... increase the complexity of the subject matter in an effort to confuse the observers. Or just follow up with something to the effect of, "Vaunted Priest of Shockernet, Mr. Wu, Great Adder and Subtractor of All Single Digit Equations On High, I bow to thee before all of Shockernet and admit that my now proven invalid argument of Utah winning 34 minutes of the game was terribly, utterly, and embarrassingly silly."

      But truthfully, I'm already exhausted on the subject, so I lose by forfeit once again.
      I only hope this thought of yours, which by the way sounds eerily like Zeno's paradox of the dichotomy which featured the infinite geometric sum, was done with your pocket protector securely in place.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
        Now don't be bringing logic to a math fight.

        Using the result of your analysis ...

        ---

        10 mini-games won by Utah x 2 minutes per mini-game = 20 total minutes of Utah "winning"
        7 mini-games won by WSU x 2 minutes per mini-game = 14 total minutes of WSU "winning"

        20 total minutes of Utah winning - 14 total minutes of WSU winning = 6 total actual minutes of Utah beating WSU

        Actual total of 6 minutes of a 40 minute game that Utah was "winning" results in actually winning 15% of the game.

        ---

        Claimed total of 35 minutes of Utah winning - 5 minutes of claimed total that WSU was winning = 30 total claimed minutes of Utah beating WSU

        Claimed total of 30 minutes of a 40 minute game that Utah was winning would result in winning 75% more of the game than the Shockers.

        15% <<< 75% But that's just an opinion so let's keep it technical ...

        Error calculation:

        75 - 15 / 15 = 400% error.

        Now I'm no engineer, or scientist, or businessman ... in fact I don't even exist but that's another topic ... so let's ask @SB Shock if I did my math correctly, and if so, is 400% error in the asserted claim that Utah won 30 minutes more of the game than the Shockers bad enough to be considered wrong?

        Q.E.D.
        Kung Wu, you are still off base. Like I said, most of the board doesn't care about this conversation whatsoever. If you want to continue to provide a circus show of sillyness for the whole board to read, be my guest, just don't anyone blame me if you are bored by it all. If you want to discuss further with me, PM me.

        Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View Post
          Kung Wu, you are still off base. Like I said, most of the board doesn't care about this conversation whatsoever. If you want to continue to provide a circus show of sillyness for the whole board to read, be my guest, just don't anyone blame me if you are bored by it all. If you want to discuss further with me, PM me.

          Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.
          I'm ok...have said my peace already.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View Post
            Kung Wu, you are still off base. Like I said, most of the board doesn't care about this conversation whatsoever. If you want to continue to provide a circus show of sillyness for the whole board to read, be my guest, just don't anyone blame me if you are bored by it all. If you want to discuss further with me, PM me.

            Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.
            You were wrong. What's left to discuss?
            Livin the dream

            Comment


            • For those of you at home keeping score (and I know many of you are, because you care), using my patent pending Social Media Activity Characterizing Kinetic Displays Of Witless Netnerds System (SMACKDOWNS), I determined the leader of the current Kung Wu vs. Jamar Howard 4 President thread battle to be … ah, f@#k it, I’m going to pour me four fingers of Macallan 12, put some Gary Clark Jr. on and get in the mood for a real SMACKDOWN of St. Louis later today.

              Go Shox!

              Comment


              • Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
                A logic-filled, perfect poster will never concede anything. He'd rather cut his willy-wacker off than admit to being wrong about something.
                You lie.

                Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View Post
                We both predicted a mediocre season and we were both proven wrong

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Bluzrover View Post
                  For those of you at home keeping score (and I know many of you are, because you care), using my patent pending Social Media Activity Characterizing Kinetic Displays Of Witless Netnerds System (SMACKDOWNS), I determined the leader of the current Kung Wu vs. Jamar Howard 4 President thread battle to be … ah, f@#k it, I’m going to pour me four fingers of Macallan 12, put some Gary Clark Jr. on and get in the mood for a real SMACKDOWN of St. Louis later today.

                  Go Shox!
                  I prefer Exalted Kung Wu, in reference to the debate that I won. In any other context, feel free to call me pretty much anything you like. ;)
                  Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                    I prefer Exalted Kung Wu, in reference to the debate that I won. In any other context, feel free to call me pretty much anything you like. ;)
                    It can't be much worse being associated with stinky cow patties in the hot Texas sun. Wear it with pride KW.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X