Originally posted by ShockerFever
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The OFFICIAL Shocks vs. Runnin' Utes Game Thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostDang it, poking JH4P with a stick is fun, because he's relentless. In fact, I lose to JH4P because he's relentless more than I do because I'm wrong. I get exhausted!
Now the simple analysis he did clearly shows he's wrong, so he only has one tactic left to win .... increase the complexity of the subject matter in an effort to confuse the observers. Or just follow up with something to the effect of, "Vaunted Priest of Shockernet, Mr. Wu, Great Adder and Subtractor of All Single Digit Equations On High, I bow to thee before all of Shockernet and admit that my now proven invalid argument of Utah winning 34 minutes of the game was terribly, utterly, and embarrassingly silly."
But truthfully, I'm already exhausted on the subject, so I lose by forfeit once again.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostNow don't be bringing logic to a math fight.
Using the result of your analysis ...
---
10 mini-games won by Utah x 2 minutes per mini-game = 20 total minutes of Utah "winning"
7 mini-games won by WSU x 2 minutes per mini-game = 14 total minutes of WSU "winning"
20 total minutes of Utah winning - 14 total minutes of WSU winning = 6 total actual minutes of Utah beating WSU
Actual total of 6 minutes of a 40 minute game that Utah was "winning" results in actually winning 15% of the game.
---
Claimed total of 35 minutes of Utah winning - 5 minutes of claimed total that WSU was winning = 30 total claimed minutes of Utah beating WSU
Claimed total of 30 minutes of a 40 minute game that Utah was winning would result in winning 75% more of the game than the Shockers.
15% <<< 75% But that's just an opinion so let's keep it technical ...
Error calculation:
75 - 15 / 15 = 400% error.
Now I'm no engineer, or scientist, or businessman ... in fact I don't even exist but that's another topic ... so let's ask @SB Shock if I did my math correctly, and if so, is 400% error in the asserted claim that Utah won 30 minutes more of the game than the Shockers bad enough to be considered wrong?
Q.E.D.
Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostKung Wu, you are still off base. Like I said, most of the board doesn't care about this conversation whatsoever. If you want to continue to provide a circus show of sillyness for the whole board to read, be my guest, just don't anyone blame me if you are bored by it all. If you want to discuss further with me, PM me.
Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostKung Wu, you are still off base. Like I said, most of the board doesn't care about this conversation whatsoever. If you want to continue to provide a circus show of sillyness for the whole board to read, be my guest, just don't anyone blame me if you are bored by it all. If you want to discuss further with me, PM me.
Anyone else on the board interested to discuss further is also welcome to PM me. I'll give you as high level or detailed answer as you want.Livin the dream
Comment
-
For those of you at home keeping score (and I know many of you are, because you care), using my patent pending Social Media Activity Characterizing Kinetic Displays Of Witless Netnerds System (SMACKDOWNS), I determined the leader of the current Kung Wu vs. Jamar Howard 4 President thread battle to be … ah, f@#k it, I’m going to pour me four fingers of Macallan 12, put some Gary Clark Jr. on and get in the mood for a real SMACKDOWN of St. Louis later today.
Go Shox!
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View PostA logic-filled, perfect poster will never concede anything. He'd rather cut his willy-wacker off than admit to being wrong about something.
Originally posted by Jamar Howard 4 President View PostWe both predicted a mediocre season and we were both proven wrong
Comment
-
Originally posted by Bluzrover View PostFor those of you at home keeping score (and I know many of you are, because you care), using my patent pending Social Media Activity Characterizing Kinetic Displays Of Witless Netnerds System (SMACKDOWNS), I determined the leader of the current Kung Wu vs. Jamar Howard 4 President thread battle to be … ah, f@#k it, I’m going to pour me four fingers of Macallan 12, put some Gary Clark Jr. on and get in the mood for a real SMACKDOWN of St. Louis later today.
Go Shox!Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostI prefer Exalted Kung Wu, in reference to the debate that I won. In any other context, feel free to call me pretty much anything you like. ;)
Comment
Comment