Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2014-15 Schedule

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by choida View Post
    love how we disrespect our MVC peers...we used to be cupcakes not too long ago...so I think we should all appreciate where we were and where we are now...I understand the Valley is not on a Marshall team coached level...but we really shouldnt throw our Valley brethren under the bus so quickly...its fine if the outside world has their opinion...but for us to say it is kinda harsh...
    I just wish they would start spending more on their basketball programs. Other than Bradley, none of the other Valley schools are spending like they think basketball should be a priority. WSU gets labeled as a mid-major because our fellow Valley schools (other than Bradley) have mid-major type budgets. Cu was the only other Valley school that was in the same ballpark as WSU and they are gone. The other schools need to step up their commitment to basketball quickly or WSU should be gone too.

    Comment


    • $22,676,172 Wichita State Shockers Wichita, KS Charles Koch Arena Gregg Marshall (since 2007)
      $21,221,264 So. Illinois Salukis Carbondale, IL SIU Arena Barry Hinson (since 2012)
      $19,567,196 Illinois St Redbirds Normal, IL Redbird Arena Dan Muller (since 2012)
      $16,120,104 Drake Bulldogs Des Moines, IA Knapp Center Ray Giacoletti (since 2013)
      $15,126,054 Missouri St Bears Springfield, MO JQH Arena Paul Lusk (since 2011)
      $14,487,768 Northern Iowa Panthers Cedar Falls, IA McLeod Center Ben Jacobson (since 2006)
      $13,646,628 Bradley Braves Peoria, IL Carver Arena Geno Ford (since 2011)
      $12,508,656 Loyola (Chi) Ramblers Chicago, IL Joseph Gentile Center Porter Moser (since 2011)
      $11,685,797 Indiana St Sycamores Terre Haute, IN Hulman Center Greg Lansing (since 2010)
      $10,456,637 Evansville Aces Evansville, IN Ford Center Marty Simmons (since 2007)

      The Shockers total athletic budget is greater than any other Valley school even though WSU doesn't have football. WSU is spending twice as much on athletics as Indy St does and they have football. Most Valley schools just aren't in the same ballpark as WSU. http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-budget/_/VALLEY

      Comment


      • Basketball expenditures only: http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-hoopsbudget

        Team Rank Basketball budget % of total athl. Budget
        WSU 62 $5,369,577 24%
        BU 91 $3,810,668 28%
        DRAKE
        122 $2,555,938 16%
        UNI 132 $2,397,995 17%
        ILS 133 $2,388,774 12%
        Loyola 138 $2,364,370 19%
        Evansville 141 $2,254,434 22%
        MO. St 151 $2,105,340 14%
        Ind. St 191 $1,695,685 15%
        SIU 225 $1,479,351 7%
        Last edited by shox1989; May 6, 2014, 04:39 AM.

        Comment


        • No Valley school should be spending less than $2 million and they all should be striving to spend more than $3 million on basketball. To be ranked in the top 100 of division 1 college basketball expenditures you have to spend over $3,250,000. All Valley schools should strive to be in the top 100. It would be nice if the conference would make that a requirement to remain a member. If the Valley wants to get back to multiple bids and to be on the right side of the upcoming split in college basketball this kind of commitment just has to happen.

          Comment


          • Despite how bad our Valley brethren were last year, nearly every team is trending up. Bradley signed a monster recruiting class!
            Livin the dream

            Comment


            • Originally posted by wufan View Post
              Despite how bad our Valley brethren were last year, nearly every team is trending up. Bradley signed a monster recruiting class!
              That's great and all...but the national perception is and has not been very good to the Valley. Wichita St. really deserves to play in a more socially recognized and respected conference. I'll say it 'til I'm blue in the face. C'mon AAC....bring us in!!!!!!
              FINAL FOURS:
              1965, 2013

              NCAA Tournament:
              1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021

              NIT Champs - 1 (2011)

              AP Poll History of Wichita St:
              Number of Times Ranked: 157
              Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
              Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
              Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)

              Highest Recent AP Ranking:
              #3 - Dec. 2017
              #2 ~ March 2014

              Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
              #2 ~ March 2014
              Finished 2013 Season #4

              Comment


              • Originally posted by AZ Shocker View Post
                That's great and all...but the national perception is and has not been very good to the Valley. Wichita St. really deserves to play in a more socially recognized and respected conference. I'll say it 'til I'm blue in the face. C'mon AAC....bring us in!!!!!!
                Agreed. The difference between where we're at and where the rest of the valley is so great that even if everyone improves next year, we'll still be at a loss. I sure hope 2014 MVC has more than one other RPI 100 team...

                Edit: that sounds incredibly cocky, until you look at how assaulted we were last year by playing in the valley and the effect it had on our RPI.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by AZ Shocker View Post
                  That's great and all...but the national perception is and has not been very good to the Valley. Wichita St. really deserves to play in a more socially recognized and respected conference. I'll say it 'til I'm blue in the face. C'mon AAC....bring us in!!!!!!
                  If the Shockers were in the AAC they would already be in the top half of that conference in basketball expenditures. I would assume that if they did actually move to the AAC the WSU basketball budget would go up if for no other reason than the increased revenue from the AAC TV package. http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-hoopsbudget

                  Rank Team Basketball Budget
                  13 MEMPHIS $8,457,959
                  24 UCONN $7,293,895
                  31 SMU $6,582,998
                  48 Cincy $6,172,290
                  62
                  WSU $5,369,577
                  75 Rutgers $4,663,032
                  78 So Florida $4,399,051
                  86 Temple $4,125,712
                  90 Tulsa $3,920,631
                  107 Central Florida $2,843,388
                  119 Houston $2,598,898

                  Comment


                  • Some have mentioned the Shockers moving to the A-10. Besides the geographical problems, WSU already has a bigger budget than any of those many teams. The A10 Tv games are on NBCSN and CBSSN. Not very desirable. The more I look at it the more I dislike the idea of going to the A-10. http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-hoopsbudget

                    Rank Team Budget
                    62 WSU $5,369,577
                    70 VCU $5,052,379
                    88 Dayton $3,985,079
                    93 Fordham $3,563,735
                    94 Duquesne $3,551,737
                    97 St. Joes $3,379,619
                    98 St. Louis $3,309,395
                    99 UMASS $3,266,120
                    102 GWU $3,107,005
                    103 GeoMason $3,010,170
                    110 Rhode Island $2,784,810
                    111 LaSalle $2,782,264
                    128 St. Bonnies $2,495,445
                    On a positive note for the A-10 their budgets are where I would like to see the Valley teams be. 10 teams over 3 million. The bottom 3 are lower than I like, but they still are way above the bottom teams in the Valley.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by shox1989 View Post
                      Basketball expenditures only: http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-hoopsbudget

                      Team Rank Basketball budget % of total athl. Budget
                      WSU 62 $5,369,577 24%
                      BU 91 $3,810,668 28%
                      DRAKE
                      122 $2,555,938 16%
                      UNI 132 $2,397,995 17%
                      ILS 133 $2,388,774 12%
                      Loyola 138 $2,364,370 19%
                      Evansville 141 $2,254,434 22%
                      MO. St 151 $2,105,340 14%
                      Ind. St 191 $1,695,685 15%
                      SIU 225 $1,479,351 7%
                      Interesting percentages in your table, 1989 -- not too hard to guess which schools have football and at what level they play.

                      The lack of football and corresponding emphasis on hoop dollars could also work to the advantage of WSU in a stepped-up league like the AAC where other schools do play football, because the Shocks could devote a higher budget proportion to their own marquee sport, and thus compensate for not necessarily spending as much on athletics in total.

                      Comment


                      • For curiosity sake I decided to see where WSU would fit in the all powerful "major" nBE. WSU would already be ahead of all of the expansion teams (including Cu). http://www.bbstate.com/info/teams-hoopsbudget

                        Rank Team Basketball Budget
                        6 Marquette $10,726,622
                        10 Georgetown $ 9,612,945
                        21 Villanova $ 7,399,471
                        22 St Johns $ 7,390,398
                        30 Seton Hall $ 6,782,187
                        38 DePaul $ 6,364,140
                        49 Providence $ 6,090,183
                        62
                        WSU $ 5,369,577
                        68 Creighton $ 5,255,770
                        81 Xavier $ 4,346,173
                        83 Butler $ 4,282,684
                        Looking at Marquette having the 6th largest college basketball budget in the nation right now, it does say a lot about what Buzz Williams thinks about the future of the nBE by leaving and going to Virginia Tech (ranked #60 with a budget of $5,458,505-about the same as WSU).

                        Comment


                        • Just seeing where WSU compares to some of the big college basketball job openings this year: Tennessee #74 $4,856,478 (this one surprised me, I guess the move to
                          Tulsa wasn't really that big of a step down for Martin afterall).

                          Missouri #40 $6,351,687 (while a bigger budget than WSU not all that much bigger) and Oregon State #89 $3,929,913 (pretty close to the same budget as Bradley- I am not worried about Marshall going there).

                          Comment


                          • I really enjoy seeing these budgets- thanks very much @shox1989:.

                            A good or great coach can massively overachieve relative to his school's budget. Likewise, a poor coach can certainly underachieve and not capitalize on his school's advantage in resources. This means budget size may not have a super strong correlation to a school's relative performance (e.g. within its conference) over a small sample size or short time horizon.

                            Over long periods (say 20+ years) where schools typically go through multiple hires and cycle through degrees of rebuilding phases, I would bet that correlation becomes much, much stronger. I think it's also as good an indicator as any for guesstimating future performance (again not for any given year, but for a broad trendline).

                            The MVC is obviously losing the arms race. I sure hope an escape is in the cards somehow.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Play Angry View Post
                              I really enjoy seeing these budgets- thanks very much @shox1989.

                              A good or great coach can massively overachieve relative to his school's budget. Likewise, a poor coach can certainly underachieve and not capitalize on his school's advantage in resources. This means budget size may not have a super strong correlation to a school's relative performance (e.g. within its conference) over a small sample size or short time horizon.

                              Over long periods (say 20+ years) where schools typically go through multiple hires and cycle through degrees of rebuilding phases, I would bet that correlation becomes much, much stronger. I think it's also as good an indicator as any for guesstimating future performance (again not for any given year, but for a broad trendline).

                              The MVC is obviously losing the arms race. I sure hope an escape is in the cards somehow.
                              Perhaps the biggest problem is that most members in the MVC seem to be unaware that an arms race is occurring.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by shox1989 View Post
                                Just seeing where WSU compares to some of the big college basketball job openings this year: Tennessee #74 $4,856,478 (this one surprised me, I guess the move to
                                Tulsa wasn't really that big of a step down for Martin afterall).

                                Missouri #40 $6,351,687 (while a bigger budget than WSU not all that much bigger) and Oregon State #89 $3,929,913 (pretty close to the same budget as Bradley- I am not worried about Marshall going there).
                                Not to nit pick but Cuonzo went to Cal and Haith went to Tulsa.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X