I’m okay with Pohto going out. But color me majorly concerned if we don’t get major shooting gravity and a much better lead ball handler.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2024 Edition-Bilas “Let them transfer at Halftime to the opposing team” Portal Update
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostPohto was a talented player and will do well somewhere where he can be the primary big. And that was the problem. Guys like Pohto would normally be getting a lion's share of the minutes. But he had a guy like Ballard in front of him, so there just weren't enough minutes to keep both of them happy. Pohto was almost always just behind Ballard in both offense and defense and/or the box score.
Ironically we need a backup at the 5 that's not as a good as Pohto so we aren't sacrificing so many of Ballard's minutes to make a slightly more marginal player happy. A new guy that doesn't have expectations of being "the man" and then end up being poison when his minutes are half of what they could be elsewhere.
We need to replace Pohto with a guy that can give us a solid 15 minutes per game, and doesn't expect more. Probably a young guy. Maybe a guy that can be a Ballard in the future, but is a JUCO transfer that doesn't have that 30 minute per game expectation coming in.
This is tricky business.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View Post
and, ideally a center that can be a change of pace guy and stretch the floor a little bit. I always like it when the subs have different strengths and weaknesses vs the starters and it requires the other team to make changes to counter our moves.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
I'm 50/50 on that. Yes, he kept them, but the ones he "kept" from last year really didn't do anything noteworthy. They were bad most of the year with only Cortes and Beverly showing anything worthwhile, but only for a couple games of the year. Its easier to keep guys that aren't in demand. Mills went 50% on those this year by keeping Ballard but losing Rogers.
- Likes 8
Comment
-
-
Photo was our ONLY back to the basket player and Rogers our ONLY legit perimeter shooter. The offense has taken a significant hit. As of today my interest in college basketball and even our program continues to decline. I simply hate what the portal and NIL has done. Maybe a couple significant portal signings can restore my faith but I just don't think we are that attractive to impact players.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by asiseeit View PostPhoto was our ONLY back to the basket player and Rogers our ONLY legit perimeter shooter. The offense has taken a significant hit. As of today my interest in college basketball and even our program continues to decline. I simply hate what the portal and NIL has done. Maybe a couple significant portal signings can restore my faith but I just don't think we are that attractive to impact players.
Pohto on the other hand, was the only back to the basket player .. but that doesn't mean he was a GOOD back to basket player. We just literally had no one else. He played well smaller than his size and while he had some moves that worked occasionally, his most common shot was a forced shot that tried to go through the defender that didn't not often go in.Last edited by Stickboy46; March 26, 2024, 04:20 PM.
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
I agree on on both .. but there are caveats. Roger was our only legit perimeter shooter and he was really good at it. He's a big loss IMO.
Pohto on the other had, was the only back to the basket player .. but that doesn't mean he was a GOOD back to basket player. We just literally had no one else. He played well smaller than his size and while he had some moves that worked occasionally, his most common shot was a forced shot that tried to go through the defender that didn't not often go in.
I saw opponents eyes light up anytime Pohto came in for Ballard.
We can replace his production I feel.
Rogers will be tougher cause he had to be defended far beyond the 3pt line which opened up the floor. So gotta have someone who will demand to be defended on the perimiter at all times. That's a tougher find IMHO"He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!
- Likes 7
Comment
-
Originally posted by asiseeit View PostMy point was we had two critical areas, back to the basket threat and three point threat, completely wiped out so now we are both weak on the perimeter and inside offensively.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by asiseeit View PostMy point was we had two critical areas, back to the basket threat and three point threat, completely wiped out so now we are both weak on the perimeter and inside offensively.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
I am curious as to where Pohto will end up. Maybe another American team (not Memphis), Mountain West, A-10, low level power-whatever. Any higher than that and maybe even in those leagues, I feel both parties will be quite disappointed. Opinions?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Why in the heck you would pine for a Missouri Valley Conference back-to-the-basket style player when you finally have a dominant center that plays above the rim with a 70%+ finishing capability is beyond me.
Ballard was 5th in the nation in 2 point field goal percentage!!
Ballard doesn't have to -- and shouldn't -- put the ball on the ground. He _shouldn't_ be playing with his back to the basket. He is WAY better than that.
He should receive lob pass after lob pass after lob pass after lob pass.
If a guard is throwing anything but lobs to QB other than for an occasional give-and-go, they are wasting one of the most effective scoring weapons in the entire NCAA Division 1 league.
We are beyond blessed to have Ballard back.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
- Likes 20
Comment
Comment