The who's who's. Surprised I am not. Unfortunate. Eyeballs, tv, etc. Par for the course. Boooh. Sucks....
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
New NIT Rules
Collapse
X
-
FINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
-
If every school not in a power conference for basketball refuses to participate in the nit tournament they will be forced to use the lowest tier teams from the basketball power teams. They can rename it the ART or the Also Ran Tournament. If a network was really interested they could start their own National Championship tournament that that would include EVERY team not in a power conference to participate. I would watch something like that and not watch a single game of the ncaa debacle.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by pogo View PostIf every school not in a power conference for basketball refuses to participate in the nit tournament they will be forced to use the lowest tier teams from the basketball power teams. They can rename it the ART or the Also Ran Tournament. If a network was really interested they could start their own National Championship tournament that that would include EVERY team not in a power conference to participate. I would watch something like that and not watch a single game of the ncaa debacle.Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind. ~Dr. Seuss
- Likes 3
Comment
-
It's been speculated for years that the power conferences would split off from the NCAA. Turns out that was wrong. The NCAA is joining them and splitting off from the rest of college sports.
The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I really hate this decision, especially the timing just days before the season. I don't think anybody involved in the sport thinks this was needed.
As a Shocker fan, I don't know that this really alters much. But I was a student manager at a top program in a 1 bid conference and for schools like mine this is a gutting decision. We already knew that any chance we had at competing in the NCAA tournament came down to three games at the conference tournament. At least there was a security blanket that winning the regular season meant something with the auto bid for the NIT. It also represented one of the only opportunities to potentially get a P5 school in our own building, think Koch Arena in 2004 when FSU came to Wichita. That's still the best atmosphere I can recall being a part of at a basketball game. So to kill that auto bid, to give bids to sub .500 teams that view NIT bids as a failure sucks for the future of smaller schools competing at the D1 level.Last edited by shockerfan34; October 28, 2023, 12:43 PM.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
For the one bid leagues, the post season tournament is more important than the regular season. NIL, the transfer portal and no penalties for transferring, and now this are three of the best moves the NCAA could make to foul up basketball as much as possible for mid majors and below.
If a mid gets a good player, the NCAA has made it nearly automatic for that player to transfer yo a power school. If a mid has a good season, doesnt matter. Still have to win the conference tourney to sniff the post season.
The mids should sue the NCAA for potential loss of revenue from losing the opportunity to host an extra home game. The NCAA has been a joke for yeatrs. It's no longer a joke. Now it's just pathetic.
The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Athletic department revenues for the top 50 revenue generators make Approx 100 -250 million / yr. Those are all power 5 schools. The next 50 schools drop to about 35 million. Those are predominantly aac swc and a few other conferences schools.
That leaves about 150 schools below the 35 million mark.
I can't imagine, that under current NIL and transfer rules, the schools below 100 and some slightly above 100 will tolerate this system for too long.
I see major changes coming in the years to come to isolate about 50 or 60 schools into their own category where they compete only with each other for national titles while the other 175-200 bring back old school transfer rules and limit athlete incomes in some way.
Last I looked the average NIL deals were about 25K/ yr. Knowing that some athletes make hundreds of thousands and even millions in some cases, tells me most student athletes make nothing from NIL. Those kids would not mind playing for a school with limited income possibility. 1- because they know they will probably never achieve the big dollars and 2- because they will have a better chance of playing and 3- because they have a better chance to win national or conference titles.
If an athlete showed as a big time player who the power schools were willing to pay, well let them go and if possible make it where he either sits a year or reimburses his current school for reniging on a scholarship contract.
I would be all for that system. But lawmakers would have to care, and I believe most would because most come from those 200 or so schools currently being screwed.
Sorry, just rambling.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Atxshoxfan View PostAthletic department revenues for the top 50 revenue generators make Approx 100 -250 million / yr. Those are all power 5 schools. The next 50 schools drop to about 35 million. Those are predominantly aac swc and a few other conferences schools.
That leaves about 150 schools below the 35 million mark.
I can't imagine, that under current NIL and transfer rules, the schools below 100 and some slightly above 100 will tolerate this system for too long.
I see major changes coming in the years to come to isolate about 50 or 60 schools into their own category where they compete only with each other for national titles while the other 175-200 bring back old school transfer rules and limit athlete incomes in some way.
Last I looked the average NIL deals were about 25K/ yr. Knowing that some athletes make hundreds of thousands and even millions in some cases, tells me most student athletes make nothing from NIL. Those kids would not mind playing for a school with limited income possibility. 1- because they know they will probably never achieve the big dollars and 2- because they will have a better chance of playing and 3- because they have a better chance to win national or conference titles.
If an athlete showed as a big time player who the power schools were willing to pay, well let them go and if possible make it where he either sits a year or reimburses his current school for reniging on a scholarship contract.
I would be all for that system. But lawmakers would have to care, and I believe most would because most come from those 200 or so schools currently being screwed.
Sorry, just rambling.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
-
The P5 will have to break away from the NCAA. That might be easy for football but very difficult for all the other sports. As for NIL, every kid going to play D1 is now expecting something, so get used to it. The Supreme Court made it legal, so they all want something, even if it’s a few hundred a month for groceries. It’s a huge mess for sure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostThe P5 will have to break away from the NCAA. That might be easy for football but very difficult for all the other sports. As for NIL, every kid going to play D1 is now expecting something, so get used to it. The Supreme Court made it legal, so they all want something, even if it’s a few hundred a month for groceries. It’s a huge mess for sure.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View PostThe P5 will have to break away from the NCAA. That might be easy for football but very difficult for all the other sports. As for NIL, every kid going to play D1 is now expecting something, so get used to it. The Supreme Court made it legal, so they all want something, even if it’s a few hundred a month for groceries. It’s a huge mess for sure.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockTalk View PostThe future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
Comment