Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Creighton wins . . . barely

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    OK. They are certainly limping to the finish line. If they go 0-1 at St Louis, they'd be 4-4 in their last 8 (I think); with their 4 wins all being nail-biters. Maybe I'm misinformed, but they certainly have been exposed as being over-hyped and overrated.

    Comment


    • #32
      CU most likely plays Drake and Evansville in St. Louis. Both teams look like potential problems for CU. Both can light it up if the D on them is weak. CU looks tired now - really tired. Some rest might get their O clicking better, but they haven't really played D all year, so that's not likely to improve. I wouldn't be a bit surprised to see CU lose before the finals.
      The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
      We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.

      Comment


      • #33
        CU has a week to get their legs back, but that may effect last only the first game or maybe two. They should be leg-tired again by Sunday if they don't falter before.
        "I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
        ---------------------------------------
        Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
        "We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".

        A physician called into a radio show and said:
        "That's the definition of a stool sample."

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by pinstripers View Post
          OK. They are certainly limping to the finish line. If they go 0-1 at St Louis, they'd be 4-4 in their last 8 (I think); with their 4 wins all being nail-biters. Maybe I'm misinformed, but they certainly have been exposed as being over-hyped and overrated.
          Sorry, first time poster here. I dont think the selection committee looks so much at how you won. Yes they will see the scores of those games and see how close they were but a win is still a win. If anything, I feel like the committee would look and say oh they can gut out close games....that could potentially make for some great bb in the NCAA tourney. Its not like they are going to go back and look at Creighton's shooting percentages for each of those games compared to earlier in the year or something. And regardless, they have the resume to get in. There are plenty of other teams who are "over-hyped and overrated" who will also get into the tournament, some far less deserving than Creighton, truth be told.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by shocker2012 View Post
            Sorry, first time poster here. I dont think the selection committee looks so much at how you won. Yes they will see the scores of those games and see how close they were but a win is still a win. If anything, I feel like the committee would look and say oh they can gut out close games....that could potentially make for some great bb in the NCAA tourney. Its not like they are going to go back and look at Creighton's shooting percentages for each of those games compared to earlier in the year or something. And regardless, they have the resume to get in. There are plenty of other teams who are "over-hyped and overrated" who will also get into the tournament, some far less deserving than Creighton, truth be told.
            Good 1st post. Welcome to ShockerNet.

            Comment

            Working...
            X