Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bracketology 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by SHURTZtheHERTZ View Post
    We are undefeated in that building. (as the CenturyLink Center that is)
    Ha-ha...I liked that! Liked that a lot!
    FINAL FOURS:
    1965, 2013

    NCAA Tournament:
    1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021

    NIT Champs - 1 (2011)

    AP Poll History of Wichita St:
    Number of Times Ranked: 157
    Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
    Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
    Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)

    Highest Recent AP Ranking:
    #3 - Dec. 2017
    #2 ~ March 2014

    Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
    #2 ~ March 2014
    Finished 2013 Season #4

    Comment


    • #17
      WSU getting an insane amount of publicity after demolishing Creighton. I think WSU has a serious chance to get a protected seed if they can keep their momentum and finish the season strong.

      At this point, it would take a meltdown of historic proportions for WSU to fail to make the tournament.

      Comment


      • #18
        I would like to travel to Omaha, then on to St. Loius.

        Comment


        • #19
          then to New Orleans

          Comment


          • #20
            Lunardi's latest bracket.
            Visit ESPN for live scores, highlights and sports news. Stream exclusive games on ESPN+ and play fantasy sports.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by shocktheheart View Post
              While a 6 is nice, I don't like that. Omaha would be much better.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by rrshock View Post
                While a 6 is nice, I don't like that. Omaha would be much better.
                Am I just dense or to be in the Omaha spots would we not have to be a # 1 ,16 , 8 or 9 seed ?? screw that
                at leas it looks that way on Lunardi's bracket,, I would rather have a better seed and meet the #1 in the E-8
                From the road I listen (Tune In radio) at home I watch ( season Ticks )

                Comment


                • #23
                  lookin at it I think I would want the # 6 seed in Columbus against LBST, and then Marquette or a remach with Davidson
                  (even tho I don't think they will be there after we whip em in BB LOL)
                  From the road I listen (Tune In radio) at home I watch ( season Ticks )

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Generally I believe that the committee wants to protect the #1 seeds and some #2 seeds, by having them play close to home. So what seeds go where are aren't set yet.

                    I am sure they would love to have WSU go to Omaha b/c it would help wtih attendance. That's why they had us as a #7 seed when KU was a #2 seed in Omaha.

                    If KU and Mizzou both end up as #1 seeds, I am sure they will be sent to Omaha. And thus the only way for us to be assigned there would be to have a #8 or #9 seed, which we don't want obviously.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      With the way that the seeds are put close to home, there is no way of knowing where a game will be. Especially with the crazy thinking provided by the selection committee.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        The other element to a "protected seed", which is 1-4, is that they won't have to play a lower ranked team that is close to their fan base.

                        Thus, if WSU was a #6 and Baylor a #3 seed, that game wouldn't take place in Omaha. That is likely why Lunardi put it in Albq.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Joe Lunardi now calling the SMC at Murry St most important BB game ever. Bascially says it is a MUST WIN game for the #14 Murry St. Racers. It's kind of amazing to me that a team ranked #14 in the nation would have to beat a top 20 rpi team at home to keep their at large hopes alive. Either their ranking is way too high or something is just really wrong with the system (actually I think both is true):

                          It could be argued, with little or no exaggeration, that the coming BracketBusters matchup between Saint Mary's and Murray State (Saturday, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN3) is the most significant game in the 10-year history of the event. The historic significance has waned somewhat since the Racers are no longer in pursuit of a perfect regular season, but this game's importance to the 2012 NCAA tournament bracket cannot be understated. Another loss by Murray, followed by the possibility of a third in the Ohio Valley Conference tournament, would put the Racers at ground zero in the annual "mid-major" vs. "middling majors" debate. And Murray would be even less than the typical mid-major in such a scenario. We're not talking George Mason or Northern Iowa or VCU or Butler. We're talking about a potential at-large candidate from a conference in which no current member has ever, as in E-V-E-R, earned an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I just noticed Lunardi has WSU and Creighton both be in Albuquerque. That would be really fun, one of the instances I could definitely cheer for CU.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Yeah I noticed there seems to be more games played at each location. Instead of 4 teams, there are now 8 teams. Maybe Im crazy but in previous years weren't there 16 sites with 3 games each? This year there are only 8 sites with more games hosted by each city ( I think a good thing if Wichita ever gets selected)

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                It's been 8 sites on the first weekend for a while now.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X