Originally posted by SHURTZtheHERTZ
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bracketology 2012
Collapse
X
-
FINAL FOURS:
1965, 2013
NCAA Tournament:
1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021
NIT Champs - 1 (2011)
AP Poll History of Wichita St:
Number of Times Ranked: 157
Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)
Highest Recent AP Ranking:
#3 - Dec. 2017
#2 ~ March 2014
Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
#2 ~ March 2014
Finished 2013 Season #4
-
WSU getting an insane amount of publicity after demolishing Creighton. I think WSU has a serious chance to get a protected seed if they can keep their momentum and finish the season strong.
At this point, it would take a meltdown of historic proportions for WSU to fail to make the tournament.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rrshock View PostWhile a 6 is nice, I don't like that. Omaha would be much better.
at leas it looks that way on Lunardi's bracket,, I would rather have a better seed and meet the #1 in the E-8From the road I listen (Tune In radio) at home I watch ( season Ticks )
Comment
-
Generally I believe that the committee wants to protect the #1 seeds and some #2 seeds, by having them play close to home. So what seeds go where are aren't set yet.
I am sure they would love to have WSU go to Omaha b/c it would help wtih attendance. That's why they had us as a #7 seed when KU was a #2 seed in Omaha.
If KU and Mizzou both end up as #1 seeds, I am sure they will be sent to Omaha. And thus the only way for us to be assigned there would be to have a #8 or #9 seed, which we don't want obviously.
Comment
-
The other element to a "protected seed", which is 1-4, is that they won't have to play a lower ranked team that is close to their fan base.
Thus, if WSU was a #6 and Baylor a #3 seed, that game wouldn't take place in Omaha. That is likely why Lunardi put it in Albq.
Comment
-
Joe Lunardi now calling the SMC at Murry St most important BB game ever. Bascially says it is a MUST WIN game for the #14 Murry St. Racers. It's kind of amazing to me that a team ranked #14 in the nation would have to beat a top 20 rpi team at home to keep their at large hopes alive. Either their ranking is way too high or something is just really wrong with the system (actually I think both is true):
It could be argued, with little or no exaggeration, that the coming BracketBusters matchup between Saint Mary's and Murray State (Saturday, 6 p.m. ET, ESPN3) is the most significant game in the 10-year history of the event. The historic significance has waned somewhat since the Racers are no longer in pursuit of a perfect regular season, but this game's importance to the 2012 NCAA tournament bracket cannot be understated. Another loss by Murray, followed by the possibility of a third in the Ohio Valley Conference tournament, would put the Racers at ground zero in the annual "mid-major" vs. "middling majors" debate. And Murray would be even less than the typical mid-major in such a scenario. We're not talking George Mason or Northern Iowa or VCU or Butler. We're talking about a potential at-large candidate from a conference in which no current member has ever, as in E-V-E-R, earned an at-large bid to the NCAA tournament.
Comment
-
Yeah I noticed there seems to be more games played at each location. Instead of 4 teams, there are now 8 teams. Maybe Im crazy but in previous years weren't there 16 sites with 3 games each? This year there are only 8 sites with more games hosted by each city ( I think a good thing if Wichita ever gets selected)
Comment
Comment