Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Colorado helping our tournament resume- currently in first place in PAC12

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by JCole200 View Post
    @JimmyD_ESPN (Jimmy Dykes) posted this on twitter today about the ol' pac 12:

    "PAC-12 is 0-20 in true road games vs RPI top 100. I'm still saying that's a one bid league this year"
    The entire conference was 1-28 against the RPI top 50. With the only top 50 win being a Stanford win at home over Colorado State.

    Their best rpi team right now is Cal at #50. The conference has all the look of a one bid conference.

    But since they are BCS, I am sure the committee will find a way to give them at least 2 bids and probably 3.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
      I noticed that RealTimeRPI has the conference SoS Rank as #3.

      http://realtimerpi.com/rpi_mvc_Men.html
      They also have Wichita State's SOS at #17.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Shox21 View Post
        Seems I've heard that "reason" before. (Like from KU and KSU for not playing WSU) or is this one of the sacrasm postings I never seem to get.
        Wow.
        The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.

        Comment


        • #19
          Thanks to rjl and WstateU for the criticisms. And no WstateU I am not new here on the board. Sacrasm, as I have said before in other threads, is not my long suit. I come from the generation that you write what you mean and you mean what you write. However, with the onset of the internet people like to get cute with their postings and frankly you don't know when someone is posting with "sacrasm" or are just plain not in the know of some things. I am getting better at recognizing this, so you can stuff your criticisms. At least Shock and pogo gave me a confirmation without the editorials and for that I thank them. And before you jump down my throat - no I don't have thin skin because I knew when I posted that there would be a couple of you "I know more than you do" types that would have some classic remark to make.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Shox21 View Post
            Thanks to rjl and WstateU for the criticisms. And no WstateU I am not new here on the board. Sacrasm, as I have said before in other threads, is not my long suit. I come from the generation that you write what you mean and you mean what you write. However, with the onset of the internet people like to get cute with their postings and frankly you don't know when someone is posting with "sacrasm" or are just plain not in the know of some things. I am getting better at recognizing this, so you can stuff your criticisms. At least Shock and pogo gave me a confirmation without the editorials and for that I thank them. And before you jump down my throat - no I don't have thin skin because I knew when I posted that there would be a couple of you "I know more than you do" types that would have some classic remark to make.
            Sorry '21, life is short and I try to offer some humor every now and then... I apologize and didn't mean to offend you.
            "You Just Want to Slap The #### Outta Some People"

            Comment


            • #21
              Buffs up by 13 on the other WSU with 5 min to go.
              Wear your seatbelt.

              Comment


              • #22
                Buffs close out the win 71-60 and are tne only undefeated team in PAC-12 conference play at this point.

                Comment


                • #23
                  I saw a stat during the Colorado game that was absolutely atrocious. I can't remember the specifics of it, but it was something like the Pac-12 was 0-20 against non con teams in the rpi top 100. I can't remember if the stat included both home and away, or if it was just away, but the fact they're 0-20 no matter the circumstance is pathetic.
                  ShockerHoops.net - A Wichita State Basketball Blog

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by _kai_ View Post
                    I saw a stat during the Colorado game that was absolutely atrocious. I can't remember the specifics of it, but it was something like the Pac-12 was 0-20 against non con teams in the rpi top 100. I can't remember if the stat included both home and away, or if it was just away, but the fact they're 0-20 no matter the circumstance is pathetic.
                    They are 0-20 in road games against the rpi top 100 but they are also just 1-28 against the RPI top 50 HOME and AWAY. The only rpi top 50 win being a Stanford win at home over Colorado State.

                    That is it for all 12 teams. They really do have the look of a one bid conference, but I am sure the committee will find some excuse to give them 2 or 3 bids. NO BCS conference has ever received just one bid since the creation of the BCS.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by shox1989 View Post
                      They are 0-20 in road games against the rpi top 100 but they are also just 1-28 against the RPI top 50 HOME and AWAY. The only rpi top 50 win being a Stanford win at home over Colorado State.

                      That is it for all 12 teams. They really do have the look of a one bid conference, but I am sure the committee will find some excuse to give them 2 or 3 bids. NO BCS conference has ever received just one bid since the creation of the BCS.
                      What would John Wooden think?
                      Where oh where is our T. Boone Pickens.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Do they have a conference tournament? If they do, one of the lower seeds will probably win it and the committee will give the regular season champ an at large bid. So they'll probably end of with two bids.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          I moved to Colorado to help our rpi. Your welcome. lol sorry thats probably the beer talking ha! Go Shockers

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by wusphlash View Post
                            What would John Wooden think?
                            He'd probably be too busy wondering what's happened to UCLA to concern himself with the other 11. The more immediate question is, what does Dana Altman think? Nice league you've got yourself into there, big guy -- although at least he's making the giant Nikebucks to be mediocre.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Colorado's rpi has improved to 65 (warren nolan). The best rpi in the PAC12 right now is Cal at 54.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by wusphlash View Post
                                What would John Wooden think?
                                No doubt he would let loose with a barrage of his most biting rant - "Goodness gracious sakes alive"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X