Originally posted by ShockRef
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wichita State vs UConn Game Thread
Collapse
X
-
We've sucked so bad since JE has been playing less than 100 percent. We went from average with him healthy, to poor with him injured. Also, halfway through the season, you think you'd start seeing improved play from the youngsters on the team. It's a very bad sign that we're not seeing progression - perhaps regression. I'll still take the high road and say perhaps we have late bloomers on the team. I certainly hope so, or this team is going to suck next year too.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wusphlash View PostHCGM talking about Jaime's foot still slowing him up but I don't think his foot has anything to do with these quick fouls. He has got to play smarter at the start of games.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post
Good point but that also may lead to the next question of.. is this team regressing?"When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Better have some sugar and water too, or else your lemonade will suck!
Comment
-
Originally posted by WichitaHawk View PostI’d rather be 8-11 and be in the AAC than be 17-2 and in the Valley. We’d probably be top 1 or 2 in the valley but I’d rather suck in the AAC than be the best in the MVC.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr. Obvious View Post
Curious why? Doesn’t sound logical.Shocker Alumni
Shocker Club Soccer alumni
Jayhawk fan but the Shockers come first
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by WichitaHawk View Post
First off we get better recruits being in the AAC. Second in the valley you literally have to win the MVC tourney to make it to the NCAA tourney where as in the AAC you can get an at large without winning the confernence tourney. Third we get more TV exposure. Fourth we play better competition. Fifth the valley sucks and is going down hill. Don’t think I need to explain anymore why being in the AAC is more logical than being in the Valley. If fans prefer being in the valley that sounds illogical.
Comment
-
I’d say recruiting is TBD. If we aren’t seeing an uptick in 3-4 years, there is a legitimate concern there imo.
-
On paper this year was our best recruiting class under HCGM. I think the future is bright. Time will tell that’s for sure. I’m a firm believer that being in the American give us a chance to land a 5 star player. We just gotta find one that is a Marshall kind of player!
-
Other than Early, none of those players had to be counted on for production their first year.
-
-
Originally posted by WichitaHawk View Post
First off we get better recruits being in the AAC. Second in the valley you literally have to win the MVC tourney to make it to the NCAA tourney where as in the AAC you can get an at large without winning the confernence tourney. Third we get more TV exposure. Fourth we play better competition. Fifth the valley sucks and is going down hill. Don’t think I need to explain anymore why being in the AAC is more logical than being in the Valley. If fans prefer being in the valley that sounds illogical.
Comment
-
Originally posted by TheShocktocles View PostThe shocks had 7 assists for the entire game. That pretty much tells you were not running the offense. Way too much one on one ball.Shocker Alumni
Shocker Club Soccer alumni
Jayhawk fan but the Shockers come first
Comment
-
And everybody talking about our great TV package in the AAC...CBS sports sucks! It is the least relevant network. It is sad.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
Originally posted by WichitaHawk View Post
We need to bench SHJ and have JB start at PG. I think he’d do way better!
sorry my sarcasm meter is broke.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Then you would have noticed that he's been starting
-
Yes and I said we NEED to bench SHJ and have JB play the point. From what I’ve seen SHJ has been playing point most of the time. I think we’d benefit from JB being the main distributor is what I’m trying to say. With SHJ being the 1st PG off the bench.
-
JB runs the point when he's in.
- Likes 1
-
So am I to assume that nothing was said about IPBC and that he was on the bench? What I don't understand is his playing time (unless he's in the doghouse). We could really use him right now and there was little reason (for all I know) for him not playing.
He played 21 and 24 minutes against Memphis and Temple, went 5-7 in both games, scored 12 points in both while grabbing 5 and 6 rebounds. Then, against Houston, he had a so-so game playing only 12 minutes, 0-4 FG, but 3 rebounds and 2 points. Next was UCF and only 2 minutes and 4 minutes against Cincy, 1-1, 1 rebound, 3 points. USF up to 13 minutes, 1-2, 3 rebounds, and 3 points, then didn't see the floor today. Over those last 5 games, 31 minutes, 2-7 FG (0-4 in one game), 7 rebounds, and 8 points.
For the season, he's shooting .500 from 2pt, .452 overall (2-7 3pt), 11-15 (.733) FT, rebounding at a rate of barely under 6 rebounds per 30m. These stats seem very decent against the other newbies stats.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockTalk View PostSo am I to assume that nothing was said about IPBC and that he was on the bench? What I don't understand is his playing time (unless he's in the doghouse). We could really use him right now and there was little reason (for all I know) for him not playing.
He played 21 and 24 minutes against Memphis and Temple, went 5-7 in both games, scored 12 points in both while grabbing 5 and 6 rebounds. Then, against Houston, he had a so-so game playing only 12 minutes, 0-4 FG, but 3 rebounds and 2 points. Next was UCF and only 2 minutes and 4 minutes against Cincy, 1-1, 1 rebound, 3 points. USF up to 13 minutes, 1-2, 3 rebounds, and 3 points, then didn't see the floor today. Over those last 5 games, 31 minutes, 2-7 FG (0-4 in one game), 7 rebounds, and 8 points.
For the season, he's shooting .500 from 2pt, .452 overall (2-7 3pt), 11-15 (.733) FT, rebounding at a rate of barely under 6 rebounds per 30m. These stats seem very decent against the other newbies stats.
Comment
Comment