Originally posted by Kung Wu
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2024 AAC Tournament Central
Collapse
X
-
I can understand feeling undervalued as you repeatedly win a conference title in a sport.
HOWEVER.
1. This event is not the hill to die on. No one outside of hickville thinks that wasn't a dirty-ass play. Perusing their board, I'd say even 2/3 of their dial-up customers are willing to go at least as far as saying if the roles were reversed they'd think it was dirty.
2. You gotta do something in the postseason before you start complaining about your league holding you back. Until then you're just whining. The conference was good enough for you to host 4 consecutive times from 2018-2022. And good enough for you to host this year if you don't implode the last 3 weeks of the season. If you're hosting every year including multiple times when you'd host the super, it's on you that you're not getting it done in the postseason, not on your conference.
3. They should just be thankful they still have a third baseman. He did that 50ft away from LaPour and lived to tell about it. You couldn't be having a luckier day.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
The comments are straight up hilarious. "ECU should leave this crap conference"
Bruh.. No one and I mean no one wants ECU lol. The average fan doesn't even realize they are a D1 school
Comment
-
Kinda off-topic, but I will use this tournament as an example, so it is not too far off base.
I had mentioned something a year or two ago, and I didn't get much response to it because it seemed kinda abstract and not applicable to WSU. Now that I have a more tangible example to use, check this out.
Let's pretend that this tournament had a best of 3 final instead of a one-game final. Imagine if WSU played the winner of Charlotte and Florida Atlantic tomorrow. WSU takes care of business to make the best of 3 championship where they meet...ECU. To win the tournament, WSU has to beat ECU in a 2-of-3 final. But wait? WSU beat ECU already. Why do they have to turn around and beat them twice?
This is the exact format that the WCWS uses. The loser of the winner's bracket final shifts to the other bracket. Now, I get that in a true double elimination bracket, you mix teams around a little to play different opponents in the loser's bracket. However, in this format where there are two 4-team brackets and the winners emerging meet in a best of 3 final, these seems rather fudged up to me.
But what do I know?
Here is last year's bracket for reference...
78-65
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuShock16 View PostKinda off-topic, but I will use this tournament as an example, so it is not too far off base.
I had mentioned something a year or two ago, and I didn't get much response to it because it seemed kinda abstract and not applicable to WSU. Now that I have a more tangible example to use, check this out.
Let's pretend that this tournament had a best of 3 final instead of a one-game final. Imagine if WSU played the winner of Charlotte and Florida Atlantic tomorrow. WSU takes care of business to make the best of 3 championship where they meet...ECU. To win the tournament, WSU has to beat ECU in a 2-of-3 final. But wait? WSU beat ECU already. Why do they have to turn around and beat them twice?
This is the exact format that the WCWS uses. The loser of the winner's bracket final shifts to the other bracket. Now, I get that in a true double elimination bracket, you mix teams around a little to play different opponents in the loser's bracket. However, in this format where there are two 4-team brackets and the winners emerging meet in a best of 3 final, these seems rather fudged up to me.
But what do I know?
Here is last year's bracket for reference...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cdizzle View Post
Deserved for even thinking about defending what his player did. Suck it everyone that isn't the Shox!
- Likes 6
Comment
Comment