Announcement

**Kung Wu** · November 12, 2015, 11:21 AM

I think there was a swashitka. I can't believe for one minute that the administration of Dook University condoned the swashitka. I also don't see what they are supposed to do about a loose nut job that would take his own turd crayon and scribble shatfitti on a wall. What should the president have done differently about this nut job?

**Kung Wu** · November 12, 2015, 11:23 AM

Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post

I think there was a swashitka. I can't believe for one minute that the administration of Dook University condoned the swashitka. I also don't see what they are supposed to do about a loose nut job that would take his own turd crayon and scribble shatfitti on a wall. What should the president have done differently about this nut job?

I also fully admit I haven't paid attention one bit to any of this story, so it's possible the administration DID condone the swashitka and therefore they have blood -- urr -- poop on their hands.

**LandStander** · November 12, 2015, 11:58 AM

Whether there was one or not Royal posted a link to a newspaper that said it was a hoax and he was also the one who posted a link to a police report that said there was one. Whatever he believes I commend him for posting the 2nd link and saying he might be wrong rather then cowering in the corner ignoring facts.

As pointed out, he may be skeptical but at least he can admit when he might be wrong. That's tough for me to do, let alone anyone. It's called cognitive dissonance.

I have nothing to gain backing up royal but I appreciated him jumping on with a new article that was a counter to his original post. Thank you sir

**RoyalShock** · November 12, 2015, 12:06 PM

Originally posted by shocka khan View Post

Nice post, but this isn't the first time you have done this to other posters. It's OK to be skeptical, but I find you beyond the point of skeptical. Sometimes you've told posters you refuse to believe their post because it comes from main stream media.

I think if you applied a little logic to this, you'd see that the kid who wrote the letter had a lot more to lose and a lot less to gain by writing it. That would mean that there's a ring of truth to what he's writing. As for the motivations of the person who did this, who knows? The fact that he used human waste to write his message could also be a perceived sign of contempt toward the Jewish community. The fact that the Jewish kid who wrote the letter said it happened each of the last 4 years kinda' throws a little cold water on your 'poor misguided dumb kid' schtick.

Once, a random incident - stupid kid. Every year for four years - someone with an axe to grind.

But I guess you aren't buying the part of the letter where it said it has happened every year for the last four years because it wasn't in the Federalist.

While I agree with you about the Shockers and Royals I definitely disagree with you on this. I think we need to agree to disagree on this one.

Yes, we will have to agree to disagree. But on your point of "every year for four years", I have read that letter twice and find no such thing. I see references to "prior years", reinforced only by one specific incident that may or may not be directly connected. Perhaps you read that somewhere else, but I just don't see it in the letter.

**shocka khan** · November 12, 2015, 12:12 PM

Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post

I think there was a swashitka. I can't believe for one minute that the administration of Dook University condoned the swashitka. I also don't see what they are supposed to do about a loose nut job that would take his own turd crayon and scribble shatfitti on a wall. What should the president have done differently about this nut job?

I love your name for MU and will use it henceforth. I'm just conflated, are they the 'Dook of the Midwest' or 'The other Dook'(not to be confused with the real Duke).