Originally posted by SB Shock
View Post
My point was, if you're going to generalize that liberal leadership = debt, you'd have to make the same generalization that conservative leadership = poverty.
Broad generalizations are generally bad and don't really help an argument, because they can be used against you easily.
Personally, though, I'd rather have a good income and be in debt than be poor and debt free. On a national scale, that's basically comparing the US to China. We're a tiny bit better off. They might own our debt, but the average person in China still makes peanuts.
Comment