Originally posted by lostshocker
View Post
---
The "ideal" scenario for 15000 homicides is: 12435 white victims, 1890 black victims
Now of the 1890 black victims we would expect (multiply the population through again):
238 black offenders (of black victims) - ideal black-on-black homicides given 15000 homicides
Of the 12435 white victims we would expect to see:
10308 white offenders (of white victims) - ideal white-on-white homicides given 15000 homicides.
---
The actual results for 15000 homicides, using 2008 ratios is (taken from Table 1 by multiplying the percentages through): 7545 white victims, 7110 black victims
Of the 7110 black victims, we know that 93% were killed by blacks (from page 13):
That gives 6612 black offenders (of black victims)
Of the 7545 white victims, we know that 84% were killed by whites:
That gives 6338 white offenders (of white victims)
---
The error using this approach is:
black-on-black error = 2678% -- (6612 - 238)/238 * 100
white-on-white error = -38.5% -- (6338 - 10308)/10308 * 100
We can also do black-on-white. We expect about 1566 {12435 x 12.6%} of black-on-white homicides. About 9% of actual white deaths were due to black offenders, which gives 679 actual black-on-white homicides.
black-on-white error = -56.6% error -- (679 - 1566)/1566 * 100
---
Same result, just more extreme values for an easily explainable reason.
Black on black crime is a crisis, while black on white homicide rates indicate no racial tension what-so-ever.
Comment