I have kept a keen eye on New York, because it's been a healthy dose of the problem. I think the current fear is that it will replicate in other major metro areas.
However, I failed to consider that New Jersey is just across the water. If you combine NJ and NY case loads, they end up having 106,000 total cases (at time of this post), and the total cases in the US is 214,000. So darn near exactly 50% of our entire country's case load.
So here's the positive news: NJ + NY total tests = 274,500. Nationally we have ran 1,179,500 tests.
So while NJ+NY = 50% of the current problem, they only represent 23.2% of the total tests. That tells me that the lion's share of other states are getting out ahead of the issue in terms of testing.
That is not to say we are definitively testing enough, but at least the rest of the country is ahead of NY + NJ in terms of testing by quite a bit.
However, I failed to consider that New Jersey is just across the water. If you combine NJ and NY case loads, they end up having 106,000 total cases (at time of this post), and the total cases in the US is 214,000. So darn near exactly 50% of our entire country's case load.
So here's the positive news: NJ + NY total tests = 274,500. Nationally we have ran 1,179,500 tests.
So while NJ+NY = 50% of the current problem, they only represent 23.2% of the total tests. That tells me that the lion's share of other states are getting out ahead of the issue in terms of testing.
That is not to say we are definitively testing enough, but at least the rest of the country is ahead of NY + NJ in terms of testing by quite a bit.
Comment