Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Darrlyn Willis pf 6-8 2016 offered, A Shocker!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by vancedave56 View Post
    Morris, Willis and Nurger at the 5.
    Kelly, Hamilton, Nurger, and Willis the 4.

    Morris and Willis end up splitting time the 5.

    Kelly, Hamilton, and Nurger battle it out for the 4 spot.
    If they don't cut it; McDuffie to the 4.
    If Hamilton's light goes on and he can handle the mental aspects of the game, he will see important minutes. But last year, his physical talent was enough to see important minutes and he only played mop up minutes.

    In my opinion, Nurger doesn't play good enough defense to play the four. His best game last year was against Vandy when our two other 5's got into foul trouble. He did a nice job of guarding their super NBA talent 7 footer (who was mostly a post up player and didn't venture far from the rim).

    If we want our best players on the court (our guards are still going to be our strength), we want Duff to be in the game. He will play both the 3 and 4 (just like last year).

    Comment


    • Originally posted by vancedave56 View Post
      Morris, Willis and Nurger at the 5.
      Kelly, Hamilton, Nurger, and Willis the 4.

      Morris and Willis end up splitting time the 5.

      Kelly, Hamilton, and Nurger battle it out for the 4 spot.
      If they don't cut it; McDuffie to the 4.
      It's not just about who beats out who at their "preferred" position, but who from another position makes themselves too valuable to not have on the floor more.

      Example: Assume Smith, Landry, and Frankamp eat up 72 (24 minutes a piece) of the 80 minutes at the 1/2, only leaving 8 minutes max. Peyton Allen makes himself too valuable to not have on the floor for at least 15-20 minutes a game and is out playing, at his positions, Kelly, Nurger, and Hamilton at their positions. Allen picks up a few minutes at the 2, the rest at the 3 with Brown. Allen basically pushes McDuffie to the 4 who pushes Willis to some 5 for the strongest 8 man rotation.

      This type of dynamics happens at every position when you have quality players that can play more than one position. A player is not only competing with players at his positions, but perhaps, stronger multiple players at positions he does not even play.

      Comment


      • Coach always says the guys that can play multiple positions will see more playing time. If Allen can play the 3 with Brown, that gives McDuffie more time at the 4, which I think we will see this year. The competition for minutes is going to be really tough.

        Comment


        • Maybe it will be tough. Maybe it won't. With so many unproven/untested guys, there may be 3-4 that are head and shoulders above the rest and 3-4 that are just role players to plug into the rotation. I hope there is a good competition for minutes, but at this point in time, it's just so hard to tell.
          "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

          Comment


          • What we really need is for Darrlyn to be as good as he looks. If he forces his way into the starting lineup, that means he either bumped Shaq to second string at the 5 or he bumped McDuffie to the 3. Either way, that team is going to be good. I don't even care what position each player plays. We have several guys that can play multiple positions and honestly that's better for their preparation for pro careers anyway. Willis and Nurger need to burst onto the scene. Sorry if that means Rashard and Hamilton struggle to get minutes, though. I like those guys a lot. Such is life on a stacked team.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Dave Stalwart View Post
              What we really need is for Darrlyn to be as good as he looks. If he forces his way into the starting lineup, that means he either bumped Shaq to second string at the 5 or he bumped McDuffie to the 3. Either way, that team is going to be good. I don't even care what position each player plays. We have several guys that can play multiple positions and honestly that's better for their preparation for pro careers anyway. Willis and Nurger need to burst onto the scene. Sorry if that means Rashard and Hamilton struggle to get minutes, though. I like those guys a lot. Such is life on a stacked team.
              I'd be as giddy as a sixth grade girl if Willis is good enough that Duff doesn't have to play significant minutes at the 4.
              "It's amazing to watch Ron slide into that open area, Fred will find him and it's straight cash homie."--HCGM

              Comment


              • Originally posted by shockmonster View Post
                Your assessment is spot on except for Rashard shooting 3's to this point. However, he may improve to be more consistent. In my opinion, Rashard, at this time lacks perimeter skills, medium range skills, and post skills on a consistent basis. He has shown the ability on occasion on all three, but he has to make a step up. His rebounding skills are probably his strong point but he isn't a dominating rebounder either. He's still a candidate to play the 4 spot but on my depth list, his level of play would be below Markis. At this point, Willis is an unknown so he would be below RK, but if RK doesn't improve, I hope that Willis steps up.
                RK doesn't have enough 3-pt attempts to make any real assessment, but he was 44.4% in 2014-15 and only 31.6% last season, for a career of 35.7%. Contrast that with Frankamp at 31.3 as a beaker and 35% as a Shocker for an overall 33.8%. I am NOT saying that RK should be shooting threes and CF should not, but it is rather interesting how preconceived expectations seem to influence out memory/judgements.

                What we tend to remember about RK shooting is the 43.3% (29-67) on layups. For the 3, 4 and 5 positions, here is their lay-up percentages (2015-16 season):

                Player Made Missed Attempts Percent
                Kelly 29 38 67 0.433
                Hamilton 13 8 21 0.619
                Morris 39 21 60 0.650
                Bush W 8 7 15 0.533
                Grady 40 20 60 0.667
                Nurger 7 5 12 0.583
                McDuffie 38 30 68 0.559
                Wessel 10 7 17 0.588
                Brown 24 19 43 0.558
                Non-Kelly 179 117 296 0.605

                If Kelly had shot the same .605 that the others did, his FG% would rise from .429 to .516. If he had shot .650, the FG% would increase to 54%.
                "I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
                ---------------------------------------
                Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
                "We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".

                A physician called into a radio show and said:
                "That's the definition of a stool sample."

                Comment


                • Originally posted by im4wsu View Post
                  RK doesn't have enough 3-pt attempts to make any real assessment, but he was 44.4% in 2014-15 and only 31.6% last season, for a career of 35.7%. Contrast that with Frankamp at 31.3 as a beaker and 35% as a Shocker for an overall 33.8%. I am NOT saying that RK should be shooting threes and CF should not, but it is rather interesting how preconceived expectations seem to influence out memory/judgements.

                  What we tend to remember about RK shooting is the 43.3% (29-67) on layups. For the 3, 4 and 5 positions, here is their lay-up percentages (2015-16 season):

                  Player Made Missed Attempts Percent
                  Kelly 29 38 67 0.433
                  Hamilton 13 8 21 0.619
                  Morris 39 21 60 0.650
                  Bush W 8 7 15 0.533
                  Grady 40 20 60 0.667
                  Nurger 7 5 12 0.583
                  McDuffie 38 30 68 0.559
                  Wessel 10 7 17 0.588
                  Brown 24 19 43 0.558
                  Non-Kelly 179 117 296 0.605

                  If Kelly had shot the same .605 that the others did, his FG% would rise from .429 to .516. If he had shot .650, the FG% would increase to 54%.
                  You obviously have a high opinion of RK. While he may have potential, from what he has exhibited so far, I don't share your opinion. I think that MM is a better player than RK. I don't see the usefulness to compare his play to Conner Frankamp.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by shockmonster View Post
                    You obviously have a high opinion of RK. While he may have potential, from what he has exhibited so far, I don't share your opinion. I think that MM is a better player than RK. I don't see the usefulness to compare his play to Conner Frankamp.
                    The only comment re CF is that his D1 shooting percentage is thought to be okay by many, but RK is criticized.

                    I never said RK was better than anyone, simply posted facts about shooting percentages and the extrapolation that if he could gain confidence, strength on lay ups, his percentages would look significantly better.

                    I still believe RK has great potential and high ceiling. He will only be a junior this season. MM is only going to be a soph and his ceiling is whatever he wants it to be. Hope they both achieve unlimited heights. As for CF, I hope that he can transfer his shooting skills into gamete me performances.
                    "I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
                    ---------------------------------------
                    Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
                    "We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".

                    A physician called into a radio show and said:
                    "That's the definition of a stool sample."

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post
                      It's not just about who beats out who at their "preferred" position, but who from another position makes themselves too valuable to not have on the floor more.

                      Example: Assume Smith, Landry, and Frankamp eat up 72 (24 minutes a piece) of the 80 minutes at the 1/2, only leaving 8 minutes max. Peyton Allen makes himself too valuable to not have on the floor for at least 15-20 minutes a game and is out playing, at his positions, Kelly, Nurger, and Hamilton at their positions. Allen picks up a few minutes at the 2, the rest at the 3 with Brown. Allen basically pushes McDuffie to the 4 who pushes Willis to some 5 for the strongest 8 man rotation.

                      This type of dynamics happens at every position when you have quality players that can play more than one position. A player is not only competing with players at his positions, but perhaps, stronger multiple players at positions he does not even play.
                      This guy gets it!
                      Livin the dream

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by wufan View Post
                        This guy gets it!
                        And on that note... Hearing very good things about PA. Based off very reliable info, he is going to get plenty-o-minutes.

                        McDuff is the next 'big thing', but hearing that PA will be the next crowd fav.
                        Summer pick up games could be interesting to observe for the in-towners.

                        That is all.
                        Above all, make the right call.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post
                          It's not just about who beats out who at their "preferred" position, but who from another position makes themselves too valuable to not have on the floor more.

                          Example: Assume Smith, Landry, and Frankamp eat up 72 (24 minutes a piece) of the 80 minutes at the 1/2, only leaving 8 minutes max. Peyton Allen makes himself too valuable to not have on the floor for at least 15-20 minutes a game and is out playing, at his positions, Kelly, Nurger, and Hamilton at their positions. Allen picks up a few minutes at the 2, the rest at the 3 with Brown. Allen basically pushes McDuffie to the 4 who pushes Willis to some 5 for the strongest 8 man rotation.

                          This type of dynamics happens at every position when you have quality players that can play more than one position. A player is not only competing with players at his positions, but perhaps, stronger multiple players at positions he does not even play.
                          It's also how you end up with a baller team.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by ShockRef View Post
                            And on that note... Hearing very good things about PA. Based off very reliable info, he is going to get plenty-o-minutes.

                            McDuff is the next 'big thing', but hearing that PA will be the next crowd fav.
                            Summer pick up games could be interesting to observe for the in-towners.

                            That is all.
                            Crowd favorite as in E. Wessel? About the same size.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by ShockRef View Post
                              And on that note... Hearing very good things about PA. Based off very reliable info, he is going to get plenty-o-minutes.

                              McDuff is the next 'big thing', but hearing that PA will be the next crowd fav.
                              Summer pick up games could be interesting to observe for the in-towners.

                              That is all.
                              I like the sounds of this comment!!
                              "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

                              Comment


                              • My wife texted and said someone named "Darrel" that is somewhere around 6'8" is helping coach at Ron's camp today. Willis is the only guy I can think of, although she hasn't sent a pic yet.
                                "You Don't Have to Play a Perfect Game. Your Best is Good Enough."

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X