Originally posted by shock
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2021-22 Scholarship Grid
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by The Mad Hatter View Post
No, he played two years of juco. Maybe you are confusing him with Jackson who did only play one year of juco?People who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. -Isaac Asimov
Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded
Who else posts fake **** all day in order to maintain the acrimony? Wingnuts, that's who.
Comment
-
Roster is taking shape nicely. I am a bit concerned about the large Junior class that is building. I still think the Shox need to target Freshman and Seniors with the final schollies if possible.
My preference would be Muscadin, a HS guard, and either hold the final scholly or use it on a senior grad transfer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View PostIf I had to guess, I would say that Muscadin won't be coming here because we have Pleasant and McFarlane. But I could be wrong.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by MikeKennedyRulZ View PostRoster is taking shape nicely. I am a bit concerned about the large Junior class that is building. I still think the Shox need to target Freshman and Seniors with the final schollies if possible.
My preference would be Muscadin, a HS guard, and either hold the final scholly or use it on a senior grad transfer.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
I know I have been on the pessimistic side but we have gotten two decent bigs and a PG.
After watching this years dance it seems obvious to me we now need to focus on
shooters / scorers. TE is the only one I have much confidence in - in that regard
which makes us to easy to defend as a team. Have to have at least one shooter
on each wing to spread the court and hopefully Pleasant can present a threat as a
stretch four.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockerLurker View Post
There's nothing to say all players want to take their extra year. We shouldn't forget that the upcoming year will be Dex and Udeze's 4th year in the program. And the other juniors have been in college just as long. It wouldn't surprise me in the least if a few "Juniors" decide they are ready to graduate and make money overseas after next season.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by asiseeit View PostI know I have been on the pessimistic side but we have gotten two decent bigs and a PG.
After watching this years dance it seems obvious to me we now need to focus on
shooters / scorers. TE is the only one I have much confidence in - in that regard
which makes us to easy to defend as a team. Have to have at least one shooter
on each wing to spread the court and hopefully Pleasant can present a threat as a
stretch four.
Tyson and Dexter are the two returners I count on to knock down threes. I’m close to putting Council in that group.
I think Jackson has the potential to be a 33-35% guy if he works on it. I would take that.
No idea what to expect from Porter or Jenkins.
Etienne, Dennis, Grant, Pleasant, Council, and Jackson shooting > 34% would be a huge improvement especially if a couple of them could get close to 40%. We’ll see if that happens or not.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
If iit really is a one time transfer rule, the large numbers of transfers will level off at some time. Coaches will all be competing for the first time transfers (because if they transfer again, they have to sit out) Then high school and Juco recruiting will pick up again.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View PostIf I had to guess, I would say that Muscadin won't be coming here because we now have Pleasant and McFarlane in addition to Udeze. But I could be wrong.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
MikeKennedyRulZ , take the following as you want, just making a suggestion. For player positions, how about using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and where a individual plays multiple positions, have what we think will be the primary position as the first number such as 1/2 or 2/1 and so forth. DD is a 3, RC4 a 3/2 (?), as some is a guess, but gives a better picture of our position strengths and weaknesses.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockTalk View PostMikeKennedyRulZ , take the following as you want, just making a suggestion. For player positions, how about using 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 and where a individual plays multiple positions, have what we think will be the primary position as the first number such as 1/2 or 2/1 and so forth. DD is a 3, RC4 a 3/2 (?), as some is a guess, but gives a better picture of our position strengths and weaknesses.
Comment
Comment