Bracketology as of December 10, 2010

[kcshocker11]

Lets just win an let the chips fall as they may!

[BostonWu]

Yeah we definitely need to win the valley tourney to get in. No doubt.

Looks like that's what he thinks as we are the only Valley team in.

A 10-seed is solid into at-large territory (All top 12 seeds and one or two 13s are "at-large"). All he's saying is there aren't any other Valley teams worthy of an at-large bid right now

I'm looking at it totally different in that he has us filling the MVC automatic seat and #10 seed has nothing to do with being viewed as an at-large team. Now if your point is that #10 is where typically the bcs at-large seats reside I would agree. But at this point its clear that all he thinks the Valley is good for is a token auto-bid #10 seed, which is a damning indictment against this league.

[RoyalShock]

He always puts the best team in a league in as the auto bid. That he put WSU as a #10 also means he thinks they will be good enough to receive an at-large should someone else win the conference tournament.

[SubGod22]

If he didn't think we were good enough for an at large we'd be 12 at best. probably 13.

[SHOXAAC]

I can't believe we, including myself, are spending time caring about where WSU is slotted in the NCAA tournament in December. I'm not a race car fan, but it's like predicting the outcome of the Indy 500 based on the pre-race pole positions. We haven't even completed the noncon. We have a better chance understanding "Who's on first." And attempting to read the mind of a bracketologist on their intent when seeding teams...again in December. Hey, I'm guilty of not only reading this thread, but posting on it, so what does that say. I'm a bored jackwagon knucklehead I guess.