With perhaps only a few exceptions BCS schools are never, ever going to deliberately do anything they think may benefit the stronger mid-major programs unless they are forced to, and I don't see that ever happening either.
Our best shot seems to be to take advantage of the tournaments like Maui as much as possible and for the stronger mid-major programs to work more cooperatively in their scheduling.
As someone mentioned in an earlier post two home-and-homes with staggered home vs away starts only costs you 1 cupcake each year. I would gladly give up that one home game with no change in season ticket price. The Shocks save they cupcake buyout fee. They lose the walkup ticket sales which is not much and the ancillary income of concessions and game sponsorships. They do incur more travel costs and maybe that is the issue. Financially I'm guessing a wash.
I don't really understand why there is not more cooperation among the non-BCS programs in scheduling each other.
Our best shot seems to be to take advantage of the tournaments like Maui as much as possible and for the stronger mid-major programs to work more cooperatively in their scheduling.
As someone mentioned in an earlier post two home-and-homes with staggered home vs away starts only costs you 1 cupcake each year. I would gladly give up that one home game with no change in season ticket price. The Shocks save they cupcake buyout fee. They lose the walkup ticket sales which is not much and the ancillary income of concessions and game sponsorships. They do incur more travel costs and maybe that is the issue. Financially I'm guessing a wash.
I don't really understand why there is not more cooperation among the non-BCS programs in scheduling each other.
Comment