Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Here we go...Games of Interest for week of 11/8 - 11/14

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Pitt pulls out the win 63-60.

    Comment


    • #32
      Alcorn State 68 Arkansas 130. That game could be fun.


      TCU wins 74-69


      BU hanging tough... down 20-13.

      Comment


      • #33
        im still confused on how someone can score 71 points in a half in a college basketball game like Arkansas did to Alcorn State.
        Follow me on twitter: https://twitter.com/Shox_KCfan

        Comment


        • #34
          BYU leads Bradley 32-25 at half.

          Northern Iowa down early 12-9.

          Comment


          • #35
            Valley better not fall on its face.....
            The mountains are calling, and I must go.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by KC Shox
              Yeah, Pitt will probably end up losing tonight and if they do, yeah, the game will have lost some of its luster but don't begin to think if Wofford could beat them then we should. We were supposed to beat UMKC at home last year too and we all know what happend there.

              If CH is not in our lineup at that game, then we are really in trouble.
              For the next ten years we are gonna have to hear you bring up UMKC....yay. Pitt is horrible, we should beat them with or without Hannah. Been saying it all along.
              "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

              Comment


              • #37
                UNI up at half......Bradley back in it, down 2 with about 12 minutes left.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by newshock1234
                  im still confused on how someone can score 71 points in a half in a college basketball game like Arkansas did to Alcorn State.
                  Somebody copied off Tom Osborne's playbooks during the 90's and translated them to basketball.

                  Freaking ridic.
                  Deuces Valley.
                  ... No really, deuces.
                  ________________
                  "Enjoy the ride."

                  - a smart man

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Pitt has proven to be beatable, but I agree with KC on this instance. In order to have a chance, Hannah must be there.

                    Just plain SUX.
                    Deuces Valley.
                    ... No really, deuces.
                    ________________
                    "Enjoy the ride."

                    - a smart man

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by ShockerFever
                      Pitt has proven to be beatable, but I agree with KC on this instance. In order to have a chance, Hannah must be there.

                      Just plain SUX.
                      Well if that is true then our team isn't NEAR as good as top 3 in the Valley regardless....I mean come on. Take away the name on their jersey...they aren't even upper half of Big East....

                      Look, Hannah is important yes. But there is NO REASON we can't beat Pitt without him...

                      They are without their 2 biggest returning players also right now....
                      "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by wsushox1
                        Told you FDU was good...
                        LOL
                        "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          By the way...updated the original post with scores thus far.
                          "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by shockerfan
                            Originally posted by ShockerFever
                            Pitt has proven to be beatable, but I agree with KC on this instance. In order to have a chance, Hannah must be there.

                            Just plain SUX.
                            Well if that is true then our team isn't NEAR as good as top 3 in the Valley regardless....I mean come on. Take away the name on their jersey...they aren't even upper half of Big East....

                            Look, Hannah is important yes. But there is NO REASON we can't beat Pitt without him...

                            They are without their 2 biggest returning players also right now....
                            Hannah is our offense and we will be lost with TM or DK or KM running the point against a team like this, this early in the year. No, Pitt isn't the same Pitt of last year, but even on an off night (like tonight for example), they're capable of coming from way behind and winning.

                            Our chances of beating Pitt were 40-60 IMO with Hannah anyways. Without him, we won't have a chance. Unless Pitt throws up bricks all night long..

                            Sorry.
                            Deuces Valley.
                            ... No really, deuces.
                            ________________
                            "Enjoy the ride."

                            - a smart man

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by ShockerFever
                              Originally posted by shockerfan
                              Originally posted by ShockerFever
                              Pitt has proven to be beatable, but I agree with KC on this instance. In order to have a chance, Hannah must be there.

                              Just plain SUX.
                              Well if that is true then our team isn't NEAR as good as top 3 in the Valley regardless....I mean come on. Take away the name on their jersey...they aren't even upper half of Big East....

                              Look, Hannah is important yes. But there is NO REASON we can't beat Pitt without him...

                              They are without their 2 biggest returning players also right now....
                              Hannah is our offense and we will be lost with TM or DK or KM running the point against a team like this, this early in the year. No, Pitt isn't the same Pitt of last year, but even on an off night (like tonight for example), they're capable of coming from way behind and winning.

                              Our chances of beating Pitt were 40-60 IMO with Hannah anyways. Without him, we won't have a chance. Unless Pitt throws up bricks all night long..

                              Sorry.
                              Wow...LOL...just wow. Let's see how this team does before we throw all the other players under a bus!!!

                              But I guess I'll get the old "I told you so" WHEN we beat Pitt...it's all good.

                              Pitt would struggle against Missouri St...seriously. They will SUCK until they get their players back and their young players have time to improve.
                              "He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                No, I seriously believe that FDU will give us a run for our money.
                                The mountains are calling, and I must go.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X