This post will be more rambling thoughts than concise opinion. Some of it is what I've seen and some of it is what others are seeing that I mostly agree with.
Defense. In general I like our on-ball defense. But our help defense seems to be getting worse as the season progresses. Several times I've seen 2-3 of our inside players watch an opposing guard drive past his defender and get to the rim without making a serious defensive move. We also seem to be a step slow reacting to screens. Is this a communication issue?
Offense. I'm beginning to have reservations about HCGM's offense, or at least what I'm seeing executed on the floor. I'm still hoping that it's just our young players struggling to "get it". An offense should create team scoring opportunities. What I'm seeing so far are guys creating their own shots and scoring almost in spite of the offense. Except for a few times when our shooters get open "spot up" shots (which may or may not be due to a failure on the part of the defense), most baskets seem to be due to a player making a move. Obviously, when you get the ball into the post the player needs to make a move. I'm talking more about what's happening on the perimeter. It just seems like we dribble a lot and make mostly pointless passes until we can dump it into the post or a guard makes a play.
Last night there was a play where Hannah got the ball into the post from the wing (I think it was to Durley). Hannah's man "dug" down on JT. Hannah just stood there and allowed another Drake defender to take one step his direction and effectively guard two Shockers. Had Hannah dropped into the corner Durley could have kicked it back out and Clevin would have either had an open shot or could have faked and drawn a foul or stepped to the side for a shot. Instead, the double-team produced a turnover.
I will say that I think our screening and use of them is getting a little better. A couple of Hannah's threes were made possible by solid, high ball-screens.
At this point I'm torn between questioning Marshall's system and thinking it's due to inexperienced players. It's compounded by the fact that nearly every one of our 3-5 position players have at least one glaring deficiency in their game, be it quickness, defense, offense, effort, fouling, or bball IQ. You can see the flashes of talent, but it seems for every flash there's one or more moments of prolonged darkness to offset it.
Are my observations off-base here? What are some of you seeing?
Defense. In general I like our on-ball defense. But our help defense seems to be getting worse as the season progresses. Several times I've seen 2-3 of our inside players watch an opposing guard drive past his defender and get to the rim without making a serious defensive move. We also seem to be a step slow reacting to screens. Is this a communication issue?
Offense. I'm beginning to have reservations about HCGM's offense, or at least what I'm seeing executed on the floor. I'm still hoping that it's just our young players struggling to "get it". An offense should create team scoring opportunities. What I'm seeing so far are guys creating their own shots and scoring almost in spite of the offense. Except for a few times when our shooters get open "spot up" shots (which may or may not be due to a failure on the part of the defense), most baskets seem to be due to a player making a move. Obviously, when you get the ball into the post the player needs to make a move. I'm talking more about what's happening on the perimeter. It just seems like we dribble a lot and make mostly pointless passes until we can dump it into the post or a guard makes a play.
Last night there was a play where Hannah got the ball into the post from the wing (I think it was to Durley). Hannah's man "dug" down on JT. Hannah just stood there and allowed another Drake defender to take one step his direction and effectively guard two Shockers. Had Hannah dropped into the corner Durley could have kicked it back out and Clevin would have either had an open shot or could have faked and drawn a foul or stepped to the side for a shot. Instead, the double-team produced a turnover.
I will say that I think our screening and use of them is getting a little better. A couple of Hannah's threes were made possible by solid, high ball-screens.
At this point I'm torn between questioning Marshall's system and thinking it's due to inexperienced players. It's compounded by the fact that nearly every one of our 3-5 position players have at least one glaring deficiency in their game, be it quickness, defense, offense, effort, fouling, or bball IQ. You can see the flashes of talent, but it seems for every flash there's one or more moments of prolonged darkness to offset it.
Are my observations off-base here? What are some of you seeing?
Comment