I did a quick comparison of the talent (on-paper) based on their recruits level between the MVC and AAC. The charts represent the average *-rating for each roster.
The myth that the MVC is getting better I think can be put to rest when you look at these numbers. Loyola looks to be the next flag ship of the MVC. Overall, there does not look to be much positive going for the MVC (which I'm sure is "no duh"). Had WSU stayed in the MVC, then it wasn't going to be pretty next year.
Now looking at the AAC....a very different outlook. WSU is well situated in the upper-third but the 2019 recruiting class is going to be important. Of course we know that HCGM gets more from his team than their raw recruiting numbers would say, but still WSU will need to recruit at little higher level (~+15%) to be at or on top of the league (on paper) for raw talent.
It does looks like UCONN and Temple will rebounding if their coaches can actually get their full potential from their recruits. Memphis just with the defections are in a free-fall
The myth that the MVC is getting better I think can be put to rest when you look at these numbers. Loyola looks to be the next flag ship of the MVC. Overall, there does not look to be much positive going for the MVC (which I'm sure is "no duh"). Had WSU stayed in the MVC, then it wasn't going to be pretty next year.
Now looking at the AAC....a very different outlook. WSU is well situated in the upper-third but the 2019 recruiting class is going to be important. Of course we know that HCGM gets more from his team than their raw recruiting numbers would say, but still WSU will need to recruit at little higher level (~+15%) to be at or on top of the league (on paper) for raw talent.
It does looks like UCONN and Temple will rebounding if their coaches can actually get their full potential from their recruits. Memphis just with the defections are in a free-fall
Comment