Originally posted by Flyer Visitor
View Post
- 12 Wichita St. 11 MVC 24-8 .9005 108.9 81 89.9 1 67.0 267 -.080 333 .5367 122 102.1 261 100.8 39 .6524 26
After:
- 13 Wichita St. 11 MVC 26-9 +22.55 110.2 67 87.6 1 66.5 301 -.079 332 +3.90 91 104.2 144 100.3 60 +7.51 10
For reference: Pre:
- 27 Vanderbilt 11 SEC 19-13 .8641 112.9 32 96.1 34 68.6 192 -.110 346 .6947 27 107.9 35 100.4 26 .6234 45
- 16 Arizona 6 P12 25-8 .8927 116.1 17 96.5 40 69.2 151 -.033 262 .6304 70 106.1 69 101.3 63 .3871 304
- 13 Miami FL 3 ACC 25-7 .8971 117.2 12 97.1 44 66.8 281 +.054 53 .7335 11 109.5 7 100.3 23 .5401 136
Post:
- 25 Vanderbilt 11 SEC 19-14 +18.80 112.6 40 93.8 23 68.8 180 -.105 346 +9.23 45 108.8 46 99.5 33 +5.95 26
- 19 Arizona 6 P12 25-9 +20.95 115.7 20 94.7 29 69.5 141 -.038 272 +7.81 61 107.8 65 100.0 45 +0.13 161
- 15 Miami FL 3 ACC 27-8 +22.44 118.3 11 95.9 42 66.3 306 +.077 32 +12.55 6 111.3 4 98.7 10 +5.04 36
(Well, crap, it looks like they aren't completely comparable, as there was a switch from Pyth to AdjustedEM, for the overall stat: http://kenpom.com/blog/ratings-methodology-update/, but in either system you can see how close things were between WSU and Miami.) Prior to that, I recall KP having ND as higher than we were, and KU about our level. Indiana was significantly lower. Played probably their best game that year. So I would rely upon it as a far better predictor than most. In the end, we have to win. It's something we are good at.
Comment