Attention National Media on GM

[Jamar Howard 4 President]

The point still stands. If ALL you care about is performance against a subset of a given metric, just use the friggin metric.

Completely disagree.

[CBB_Fan]

Completely disagree.

The problem is that performance is purely based on number of wins, not winning percentage. That makes sense when comparing two teams with a lot of chances each, like Oregon and Kansas, where the number of wins corresponds pretty closely to winning percentage. It makes not sense when you say a 4-7 team is equivalent to a 4-12 team or a 4-1 team. It is far easier for a power conference team to get ~50/50 against 10-20 teams than it is for a mid-majors to go 75/25 against 5-10, especially when you consider the home court advantage difference.

I also think that the selection committee highly over weighted quality wins. It seems that they used that as their primary metric and only used other metrics as tiebreakers. Almost any holistic approach would been preferable.

[Art Bunch]

You all can feel free to continue this argument over on the Dr Who forum.

[kcshocker11]

I saw WSU mentioned on Pardon the Interruption on ESPN. Anyone know what that was all about?

[choida]

I saw WSU mentioned on Pardon the Interruption on ESPN. Anyone know what that was all about?

What else besides Marshalls name in any coaching ringer

[wu_shizzle]

I saw WSU mentioned on Pardon the Interruption on ESPN. Anyone know what that was all about?

1yr Anniversary of taking KU to the woodshed.

[mjbaker84]

listen to mark few on jim rome today about power 5 crap and schedule b.s.