Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Series Renewal With Creighton

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    They're no better than a mediocre Valley team. And they aren't even from a major conference.

    Buy em or look elsewhere.
    Deuces Valley.
    ... No really, deuces.
    ________________
    "Enjoy the ride."

    - a smart man

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Shocker-maniac View Post
      I agree. I'm not convinced of this, but some might make the argument that Creighton has bottomed out and will be on an upward trajectory. I will believe it when I see Creighton actually play some defense. However, they've had pretty good success with recruiting and transfers in the past couple of years.
      After reading the reports on SN today, I officially retract my statements about Creighton being on any sort of upward trajectory. Please put me in the "why are we considering scheduling a h/h series with a team like Creighton" category.

      #eatingcrowpie
      ShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Shocker-maniac View Post
        After reading the reports on SN today, I officially retract my statements about Creighton being on any sort of upward trajectory. Please put me in the "why are we considering scheduling a h/h series with a team like Creighton" category.

        #eatingcrowpie
        1) We have around 10 non-con games to fill every year.
        2) TV packages already in place
        3) They are regional
        4) There is a lot of fan interest regardless of what's posted on SN.
        5) Gregg wants it.

        Do they need to be the "highlight" of our schedule? No. Are they a better alternative? Yes.
        Where oh where is our T. Boone Pickens.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by wusphlash View Post
          1) We have around 10 non-con games to fill every year.
          2) TV packages already in place
          3) They are regional
          4) There is a lot of fan interest regardless of what's posted on SN.
          5) Gregg wants it.

          Do they need to be the "highlight" of our schedule? No. Are they a better alternative? Yes.
          Those are all good points. Just kickin' myself for having so much faith in Creighton.
          ShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.

          Comment


          • #50
            **** Creighton. We can get easy wins elsewhere.

            Comment


            • #51
              There's no way I want to play the Bluegays again.

              Comment


              • #52
                Creighton won't always suck. We won't always be a Top 10 team. It's a good relationship to establish right now. It's a good h/h. It's not a good Sprint game currently, but could be one day.
                Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                  Creighton won't always suck. We won't always be a Top 10 team. It's a good relationship to establish right now. It's a good h/h. It's not a good Sprint game currently, but could be one day.
                  Agreed. I miss having a rival, too.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                    Creighton won't always suck. We won't always be a Top 10 team. It's a good relationship to establish right now. It's a good h/h. It's not a good Sprint game currently, but could be one day.
                    A short road trip is always fun. Better than umkc.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Originally posted by Rosewood View Post
                      **** Creighton. We can get easy wins elsewhere.
                      I would like to do that.....every year.

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                        Creighton won't always suck. We won't always be a Top 10 team. It's a good relationship to establish right now. It's a good h/h. It's not a good Sprint game currently, but could be one day.
                        I find your lack of faith.....disturbing.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Dave Stalwart View Post
                          Schedule strength and entertainment value would be through the roof if these games were usually on the table.

                          It's been discussed at length, over and over again, but I'll never be able to understand why stuff like this isn't very common.
                          I think it is almost a Big 12 mandate not to play Valley teams.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Heinro View Post
                            I think it is almost a Big 12 mandate not to play Valley teams.
                            Valley teams beat KU 75% of the time. KU beats Big12 teams 80%+ of the time. If the team that owns you gets owned by other teams, it's probably best to look elsewhere for wins.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Cdizzle View Post
                              Valley teams beat KU 75% of the time. KU beats Big12 teams 80%+ of the time. If the team that owns you gets owned by other teams, it's probably best to look elsewhere for wins.
                              Boom!!! Perfectly established!!! :)
                              FINAL FOURS:
                              1965, 2013

                              NCAA Tournament:
                              1964, 1965, 1976, 1981, 1985, 1987, 1988, 2006, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2021

                              NIT Champs - 1 (2011)

                              AP Poll History of Wichita St:
                              Number of Times Ranked: 157
                              Number of Times Ranked #1: 1
                              Number of Times Top 5: 32 (Most Recent - 2017)
                              Number of Times Top 10: 73 (Most Recent - 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017)

                              Highest Recent AP Ranking:
                              #3 - Dec. 2017
                              #2 ~ March 2014

                              Highest Recent Coaches Poll Ranking:
                              #2 ~ March 2014
                              Finished 2013 Season #4

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                It may not be as difficult to schedule top notch teams starting next Season when Baker and FVV are graduated. I could care less whether we do or don't play Creighton, but I appreciate that 3G works hard at improving our Non-Con games.
                                Shocker basketball will forever be my favorite team in all of sports.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X