If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I think that a "sign of weakness" is a poor way (maybe humorous) to describe what Gregg thinks about fouls being called. After all, there are only so many a game. He thinks that a team needs to make adjustments during the game without a crutch of being told exactly what to do. Also, if a team relies on a time out to break the momentum of the other team, they may need several time outs for that purpose, and use all of their time outs. Gregg likes to have timeouts to use strategically, at the end of games, or to catch up (after made baskets, stop the clock, and set up defense) if we are behind. At times, one can look afterward and say a time out may have helped, but overall, Gregg does a good job of game management in my opinion.
If there's anything I don't like about HCGM, this is it. Timeouts are most certainly not a sign of weakness. Timeouts are completely necessary sometimes to slow momentum, talk strategy, fire up the team, etc. I totally disagree with HCGM on this one
If there's anything I don't like about HCGM, this is it. Timeouts are most certainly not a sign of weakness. Timeouts are completely necessary sometimes to slow momentum, talk strategy, fire up the team, etc. I totally disagree with HCGM on this one
He's used it to develop a team that can pull itself out of problems instead of standing around peeing down their leg and hoping someone else will rescue them. I'm sure a couple of specific instances can be pointed to when it backfired, but generally speaking the theory has created a very tough team that takes care of crap themselves. There's the added benefit that generally Marshall has the more skilled, more athletic, better conditioned team, and reducing stoppages in play will generally benefit that team.
Tactically, it also preserves all timeouts for stealing possessions on loose balls and late game subbing and play calling.
Let's see... to go with Gregg's strategy on timeouts or yours....yeaaauuu...........I think I go with Gregg's. He just barely nudges you out for Coach of the Year.
He's used it to develop a team that can pull itself out of problems instead of standing around peeing down their leg and hoping someone else will rescue them. I'm sure a couple of specific instances can be pointed to when it backfired, but generally speaking the theory has created a very tough team that takes care of crap themselves. There's the added benefit that generally Marshall has the more skilled, more athletic, better conditioned team, and reducing stoppages in play will generally benefit that team.
Tactically, it also preserves all timeouts for stealing possessions on loose balls and late game subbing and play calling.
Hey, it's worked for him, that's great. It's just not the strategy or philosophy I'd use, but I can definitely see why he feels that way. Perhaps using a timeout against Tulsa would have been wise. I'd say he's doing a fine job though if his philosophy on timeouts is the only thing I disagree with him on.
Comment