-
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample." -
This is really neat.
Do you have the data to also do the proportions? Are we just getting fewer rebounds per game or are Cotton, Baker, and FVV getting a larger share of the rebounds? -
Interesting. Not sure what it means, but it is fun to look at.
Should Wessel be included in with the Bigs this year, as he is taking probably 15 of the 40 available mpg at those positions so far this year? Or are you intentionally removing him as a side effect of playing out of position as a result of lack of production by the more traditionally-sized bigs?Comment
-
What if you remove Early and Nurger from the equation? Or I guess you don't necessarily have to remove Nurger. I guess what I'm trying to say is that we know we don't have a Cleanthony this year but how does this years group of group of post guys compare to last years group of "everyone but Cle" post men. Not sure if that information is even pertinent but I'm curious.Comment
-
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."Comment
-
Had the same question. I think Wessel's numbers should be included. It is significant that we replaced a four headed monster with a five headed monster.. and that still might not be enough..Originally posted by Cdizzle View PostKansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
It doesn't appear Early was actually removed from the data. The graphs are the same with and 'without' him.Originally posted by pie n eye View PostComment
-
Tough to compare because sos has been tougher so far. We have faced bigger and more athletic teams then we did last year at this time. But I love stats and numbers, so still cool to look at."He called me around noon and was thrilled," Brandt said. "He said he was going to be a Shocker forever." -- RIP Guy, you WILL indeed be a Shocker forever!Comment
-
Am I the only one to see "big man tracker" and think someone had already started tracking Santa? Lol sorry to throw this off topic.Comment
-
"I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."Comment
-
-
Thanks for the charts. Mucho thanks.
Cle was an outstanding offensive rebounder. I am not sure of the point for removing him from the data."Prediction is very difficult, especially if it is about the future."
--Niels Bohr
Comment
-
I assume the point might be to assess how everyone is doing without him, keeping in mind that he was really good and the new guys can't possibly live up to that yet.Originally posted by Ricardo del Rio View PostComment
-
Well, I was surprised by how little change it made but didn't have enough time to question it too much. Plus, I thought I could trust im4wsu. Jk.Originally posted by Cdizzle View PostComment
Tweet
Comment