Originally posted by SirShoxAlot
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Ron Baker media love and accolades thread
Collapse
X
-
Ron Baker will go down as one of the great recruiting steals of the high school class of 2012. He had a late growth spurt to 6-foot-3 and, before Wichita State swooped in, was a no-star prospect from Scott City, Kan., with offers from Eastern Illinois, Arkansas-Little Rock and South Dakota State (where he might have become the next Nate Wolters). After playing a big role in the Shockers' Final Four run last season, Baker has emerged as a star as a sophomore, scoring with a remarkable level of efficiency. His Offensive Rating of 140.3 (or 1.403 PPP) is seventh-highest in the nation among players using at least 20 percent of their team's possessions, according to kenpom.com.
@SInow: College Hoops Power Rankings: 1. Arizona 2. Syracuse 3. Ohio St. 4. Wisconsin 5. Michigan St. | See the rest here: http://on.si.com/193uQ0hKansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dan View Posthttp://espn.go.com/ncb/notebook/_/pa...202/daily-word
Ron mentioned in this article for Most Significant Individual Achievement by Andy Katz
Comment
-
Originally posted by jocoshock View PostRon Baker will go down as one of the great recruiting steals of the high school class of 2012. He had a late growth spurt to 6-foot-3 and, before Wichita State swooped in, was a no-star prospect from Scott City, Kan., with offers from Eastern Illinois, Arkansas-Little Rock and South Dakota State (where he might have become the next Nate Wolters). After playing a big role in the Shockers' Final Four run last season, Baker has emerged as a star as a sophomore, scoring with a remarkable level of efficiency. His Offensive Rating of 140.3 (or 1.403 PPP) is seventh-highest in the nation among players using at least 20 percent of their team's possessions, according to kenpom.com.
@SInow: College Hoops Power Rankings: 1. Arizona 2. Syracuse 3. Ohio St. 4. Wisconsin 5. Michigan St. | See the rest here: http://on.si.com/193uQ0h
Player A 10 FGA - 0 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 10 possessions in which he took 5 shots
Player B 10 FGA - 5 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 5 possessions in which he took 5 shots
If the team had 50 possessions, Player A would qualify for consideration under the 20% rule, but Player B would not.
I wonder why they don't just use a simple standard, 20% of 40 minutes = 8 minute per game."I not sure that I've ever been around a more competitive player or young man than Fred VanVleet. I like to win more than 99.9% of the people in this world, but he may top me." -- Gregg Marshall 12/23/13 :peaceful:
---------------------------------------
Remember when Nancy Pelosi said about Obamacare:
"We have to pass it, to find out what's in it".
A physician called into a radio show and said:
"That's the definition of a stool sample."
Comment
-
Originally posted by im4wsu View PostPossessions for a team are usually calculated by formula [e.g, StatSheet uses FGAs - OffRebs + TOs + (.475*FTAs)]. Using the same formula for a player doesn't make sense to me, because two players would have the same number of possessions, but one would be taking a larger percentage of shots than the other:
Player A 10 FGA - 0 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 10 possessions in which he took 5 shots
Player B 10 FGA - 5 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 5 possessions in which he took 5 shots
If the team had 50 possessions, Player A would qualify for consideration under the 20% rule, but Player B would not.
I wonder why they don't just use a simple standard, 20% of 40 minutes = 8 minute per game.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
Comment
-
It's spreading: http://scores.espn.go.com/ncb/preview?gameId=400500015
While coach Gregg Marshall has taken comfort in knowing there isn't much Rob Baker can't do, that has become a difficult lesson for Wichita State opponents.
Comment
-
Originally posted by jocoshock View PostThat must be why he was a "steal"...
Comment
-
Originally posted by im4wsu View PostPossessions for a team are usually calculated by formula [e.g, StatSheet uses FGAs - OffRebs + TOs + (.475*FTAs)]. Using the same formula for a player doesn't make sense to me, because two players would have the same number of possessions, but one would be taking a larger percentage of shots than the other:
Player A 10 FGA - 0 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 10 possessions in which he took 5 shots
Player B 10 FGA - 5 OR + 0 TO + .475*0 FT) = 5 possessions in which he took 5 shots
If the team had 50 possessions, Player A would qualify for consideration under the 20% rule, but Player B would not.
I wonder why they don't just use a simple standard, 20% of 40 minutes = 8 minute per game.
Comment
-
College Basketball Talk's Top 20 Most Improved Players
Could have sworn I saw this before, thus probably posted before, but it has been a slow week..
Prior to the season, every pundit for every outlet across the country will put together his or her list of players with the potential to have a breakout season.
Ron Baker, Wichita State: Ron Baker was a key role player for the Shockers last season. He’s turned into arguably their best player this year, a 6-foot-4 combo-guard averaging 15.3 points, 4.6 boards and 3.6 assists. Scouts that go to watch Cleanthony Early leave raving about Baker.Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
Predicting Biggest 2014 NBA Draft Sleepers
It is from BleacherReport, but I guess their NBA stuff is supposed to be better than the rest of the site.
Comment
-
Originally posted by RoyalShock View PostPredicting Biggest 2014 NBA Draft Sleepers
It is from BleacherReport, but I guess their NBA stuff is supposed to be better than the rest of the site.Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
Comment