Originally posted by Stickboy46
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Wichita State (9-3) at Temple (7-5) Game Discussion: Jan 03 (Fri)
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
Dude. If you missed K-State, you missed one of our best games in many years. Also, you missed the best dunk since Tekele. There's still stuff to watch!
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I still think 12-6, 22-9 overall with a chance of the NIT. That's about what I thought before the season. On the surface that's good progress for year 2, but it doesn't take 4-5 years to build a winner now either. I'm not sold on Mills but not ready to write him off either.
The test is going to be next year. Mills is going to lose almost every single contributor next year. If he can manage to improve next year with basically a whole new team, maybe people start buying in. I certainly would.
If we take a big step back, and we're hearing about needing to rebuild after losing 9 seniors it's going to get ugly.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockRef View PostHill and Ballard will be hard to replace. Beverly...Has his moments but is easily replaced. Washington is a keeper, for certain!
The rest of the SR's are average at best players (basically Valley level types) and you can throw McGinness in with them.
This staff has recruited a lot of role type players and not many have the ability or talent to take this team to the next level or a winning platform.
Quite simply, they just aren't that talented.
The Meeks situation and his injury or whatever it is, is killing this team inside. Both in talent, depth and of course the fatigue factor really causing major headaches.
That is all.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Topshock View Post
This is true! Even in the 90's, if you love basketball, there were plenty of moments worth seeing at games.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by cjp27 View PostI still think 12-6, 22-9 overall with a chance of the NIT. That's about what I thought before the season. On the surface that's good progress for year 2, but it doesn't take 4-5 years to build a winner now either. I'm not sold on Mills but not ready to write him off either.
The test is going to be next year. Mills is going to lose almost every single contributor next year. If he can manage to improve next year with basically a whole new team, maybe people start buying in. I certainly would.
If we take a big step back, and we're hearing about needing to rebuild after losing 9 seniors it's going to get ugly.
We’re going to lose 98% of our scoring. Our only returner with any experience would be Joy, our nineth or tenth man. I realize Washington is a junior, but I’m sure Memphis and Arkansas realize that as well. 90% chance he’s not coming back. The portal is going to be absolutely critical this off season. Somehow, someway we’re going to have to get underclassmen out of the portal. As bad as everyone seems to think we are this year, the potential is there for it to be way worse next year.
- Likes 5
Comment
-
After WSU joined the AAC in 2017, Gregg Marshall's teams went 3 - 3 against Temple, and 0-2 at Temple. So, in isolation, this loss isn't too terrible.
Still doesn't keep me from wanting to take a dump all over Mills, though. This team is all over the place. After getting our cheeks clapped by UKC only sterling performances the rest of the season will have us walking right. And this aint it.The truth will set you free. But first, it will piss you off.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post
We can get to 22 wins without beating a single Top 100 team.
Oh i take that back, UNI is Top 100 .. 8-5 UNI would be our best win.
We need to stop looking at Win count as a measure of success, by itself its pointless. Mills has a history of inflating win count with easy schedules. We need to consistently beat good teams ALONG with a high win count for it to not be a disappointment.
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Originally posted by cjp27 View PostI still think 12-6, 22-9 overall with a chance of the NIT. That's about what I thought before the season. On the surface that's good progress for year 2, but it doesn't take 4-5 years to build a winner now either. I'm not sold on Mills but not ready to write him off either.
The test is going to be next year. Mills is going to lose almost every single contributor next year. If he can manage to improve next year with basically a whole new team, maybe people start buying in. I certainly would.
If we take a big step back, and we're hearing about needing to rebuild after losing 9 seniors it's going to get ugly.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by ShockHat View PostSomeone said apathy has set in? It definitely has. I haven’t bothered to watch any of the last 3-4 games, other than checking score online. I can tell I haven’t missed a thing. So sick and tired of Mills. At this point, he’s got a senior laden team HE kept and put together. All this “experience” and he can’t even sniff the ******* NIT.
Closely creeping from apathetic to actively disliking the whole program, given this is really starting to look like our identity from here on out.
Call me crazy, but program that we all loved would’ve never lost to freaking UMKC.The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rjl View PostAfter WSU joined the AAC in 2017, Gregg Marshall's teams went 3 - 3 against Temple, and 0-2 at Temple. So, in isolation, this loss isn't too terrible.
Still doesn't keep me from wanting to take a dump all over Mills, though. This team is all over the place. After getting our cheeks clapped by UKC only sterling performances the rest of the season will have us walking right. And this aint it.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Unless we get some MAJOR NIL donations, there's not much reason to expect a good recruiting class. Players sign with the highest bidder. I'm not a Mills fan, but he's what we've got for the next couple of years. VMI says they are paying $4 mill in NIL, and they are not paying a football team.
In the current era with NIL and the portal, the quality of basketball a school can put on the court is directly related to the amount of money that school can pay players. It appears that WSU is losing the NIL arms race. As long as that is lost, a coach has limited ability to attract quality players.
Arkansas paid Ricky Council $250,000, which was probably more than WSU paid to the entire team. Council would go for considerably more in today's market.
National relevance for WSU basketball is probably dead unless there are big changes to NIL rules or WSU can raise the $7 million in NIL funds that Saal says the program needs. $7 mill won't put WSU in competition with the power conferences, but would put us toward the top end of the non-power conference teams. If that's where you want to be, then find a way to get that $7 mill. In the meantime you can gripe about how the coach can't recruit. Firing the coach just increases the expenses of the athletic department, and uses money that could otherwise go toward NIL.
The future's so bright - I gotta wear shades.
We like to cut down nets and get sized for championship rings.
Comment
Comment