Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024-25 Bracketology

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Maizerunner08 View Post
    1 bid conference as a 10 seed? Woof

    Is this like the 4th or 5th preseason in a row Memphis has been projected to go?
    It’s all about those stars and that high NBA pedigree that Penny instills.

    Most overrated program in college basketball. They’ll fall on their face again and then maybe the hype train will come crashing down once and for all.
    Deuces Valley.
    ... No really, deuces.
    ________________
    "Enjoy the ride."

    - a smart man

    Comment


    • #17
      For the first time in a long, long time, a team not named Kansas is the top overall seed. Instead, it's Auburn, as the SEC takes over the bracket.


      By Joe Lunardi
      Updated: 10/22/2024 at 9:00 a.m. ET

      Teams Of Interest
      7th Seed – Florida
      8th Seed – Wake Forest
      9th Seed – Kansas State
      10th Seed – Memphis

      First Four Out
      None

      Next Four Out
      None

      Comment


      • #18
        For the first time in a long, long time, a team not named Kansas is the top overall seed. Instead, it's Auburn, as the SEC takes over the bracket.


        By Joe Lunardi
        Updated: 11/19/2024 at 11:15 a.m. ET​

        Teams Of Interest
        6th Seed – Florida (up one seed line)
        8th Seed – Memphis (up two seed lines)
        9th Seed – Wake Forest (down one seed line)

        First Four Out
        None

        Next Four Out
        2nd spot - Kansas State (previous 9th Seed)​

        Comment


        • #19
          KSU has not looked like a tourney team.

          Not even a bubble team.

          Comment


          • #20

            Comment


            • #21
              Call me a conspiracy theorist, but this almost looks like a new metrics bid grab by the power - whatever conferences. Hope I am wrong.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by BAShocker View Post
                Call me a conspiracy theorist, but this almost looks like a new metrics bid grab by the power - whatever conferences. Hope I am wrong.
                It's actually the opposite. It gives a level playing field to judge smaller schools against power conference teams.

                Team wins - (projected amount of wins vs. their schedule for a bubble team) = Wins Above Bubble

                Link

                It would have been much more favorable to teams like Indiana State last year (should have been a 7 seed) and North Texas in 2023.
                Last edited by Kel Varnsen; 1 week ago.
                "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

                Comment


                • #23
                  The word "expected", just makes this a stupid measuring stick. Who sets this " expected" win rate?
                  College basketball is going down the tubes in every way lately.
                  ​​​​​​

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Atxshoxfan View Post
                    The word "expected", just makes this a stupid measuring stick. Who sets this " expected" win rate?
                    College basketball is going down the tubes in every way lately.
                    ​​​​​​
                    Algorithms set the expected win rate based on predictive metrics, accounting for each game's score, pace (possessions), and location. You've heard of KenPom right? WAB would be using the predictive ratings to establish a baseline for all 360+ teams of what the predicted number of wins of a hypothetical bubble team would be. Every iteration of this, whether Torvik or Seth Burn has done it, has led to more favorable treatment for mid-major schools.

                    It's one of the few developments in college basketball that's actually moving in a positive direction.

                    John Gasaway Article 1

                    John Gasaway Article 2 - this might be the best one
                    "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

                    Comment


                    • #25

                      Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post

                      Algorithms set the expected win rate based on predictive metrics, accounting for each game's score, pace (possessions), and location. You've heard of KenPom right? WAB would be using the predictive ratings to establish a baseline for all 360+ teams of what the predicted number of wins of a hypothetical bubble team would be. Every iteration of this, whether Torvik or Seth Burn has done it, has led to more favorable treatment for mid-major schools.

                      It's one of the few developments in college basketball that's actually moving in a positive direction.

                      John Gasaway Article 1

                      John Gasaway Article 2 - this might be the best one
                      So algorithms are perfect? Algorithms all agree? We know that selection committees (people) aren’t perfect. But who sets the algorithms (People)? It all depends on which model (Algorithm), the people decide to use. Who has the power? Television Executives and Power Conferences.

                      it’s the same problem I heard regarding the Baseball World Series when a so called, or self proclaimed television expert said in October that this year was a “dream” baseball World Series, because it was the New York Yankees vs. the Los Angeles Dodgers.

                      My thought was, it wasn’t my “dream” World Series. Even though I like baseball, that turned me off, and I didn’t watch an inning.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post

                        Algorithms set the expected win rate based on predictive metrics, accounting for each game's score, pace (possessions), and location. You've heard of KenPom right? WAB would be using the predictive ratings to establish a baseline for all 360+ teams of what the predicted number of wins of a hypothetical bubble team would be. Every iteration of this, whether Torvik or Seth Burn has done it, has led to more favorable treatment for mid-major schools.

                        It's one of the few developments in college basketball that's actually moving in a positive direction.

                        John Gasaway Article 1

                        John Gasaway Article 2 - this might be the best one
                        Great game if you like counting beans.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X