Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2024-25 Schedule

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • WuDrWu
    replied
    Chet Huntley, Lincoln Chafee, Dennis Erickson & Jan Stenerud were all Montana State Bobcats.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stickboy46
    replied
    They did make the tourney last year at least. Definitely need to win it big

    Leave a comment:


  • SubGod22
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockerFever View Post

    Actually 208, which was only 57 spots below us.
    Nope, 217.

    image.png

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockerFever
    replied
    Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post

    NET of 217 last season...
    Actually 208, which was only 57 spots below us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aargh
    replied
    While I know that Montana is a state, I did not know there was a Montana State.

    Leave a comment:


  • WuShock16
    replied
    Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post

    NET of 217 last season...
    Gotta win that one by 30 then...

    Low ranked opponents like that are not necessarily bad...but you have to practically run up the score on them.

    Leave a comment:


  • SubGod22
    replied
    Originally posted by TrackSuitAndTie View Post
    NET of 217 last season...

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackSuitAndTie
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Onegreatracer
    replied
    Fun lower bracket

    Leave a comment:


  • WuShock Reaper
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockerFever
    replied
    Originally posted by TrackSuitAndTie View Post


    Hear me out: what if they made this a three-game, eight team tournament instead? Dumb to only get two games.
    That’s what it has always been prior to this year.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockTalk
    replied
    TrackSuitAndTie and BostonWu

    About the only "great" SN content will be if we play well against that top group.

    With this many "new parts" to the team, anything else doesn't mean much.

    I think we would have gotten a better gage playing the second group, win or lose, in spite of having a lot of new parts, because we shouldn't be outclassed.

    Leave a comment:


  • BostonWu
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post

    Hopefully, we play well, surprise a team or 2 and have something to build on. However, if all that happens is that we end up "gettin' a woopin'", what does that do for us?
    Provides a real gage on the team rather than false hope. With a senior laden team I'd much rather cut to the chase.

    Leave a comment:


  • TrackSuitAndTie
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post

    Hopefully, we play well, surprise a team or 2 and have something to build on. However, if all that happens is that we end up "gettin' a woopin'", what does that do for us?
    Makes for some great SN content

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by Aargh View Post

    I have a feeling that the P5's in the field didn't want to risk a loss against a mid-major.
    Hopefully, we play well, surprise a team or 2 and have something to build on. However, if all that happens is that we end up "gettin' a woopin'", what does that do for us?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X