2023-2024 Conference NET Rankings

[SubGod22]

12.10.23

17 FAU
40 Memphis
79 SMU
97 Wichita
101 Charlotte
110 Tulane
121 North Texas
149 Temple
188 Tulsa
201 USF
254 UAB
266 ECU
268 Rice
299 UTSA

Non-Con

141 Lipscomb
169 Western Kentucky
341 Coastal Carolina
57 Liberty
220 Saint Louis
168 Norfolk State
102 Richmond
91 Missouri
145 South Dakota State
73 SIU
80 K-State
14 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

44 Dayton
114 VCU

12.17.23

10 FAU
34 Memphis
62 SMU
91 Wichita
108 Charlotte
110 Tulane
129 North Texas
147 Temple
173 USF
189 Tulsa
209 Rice
238 UAB
253 ECU
284 UTSA

Non-Con

140 Lipscomb
159 Western Kentucky
340 Coastal Carolina
54 Liberty
213 Saint Louis
191 Norfolk State
89 Richmond
98 Missouri
146 South Dakota State
102 SIU
92 K-State
13 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

30 Dayton
96 VCU

[SubGod22]

12.17.23

10 FAU
34 Memphis
62 SMU
91 Wichita
108 Charlotte
110 Tulane
129 North Texas
147 Temple
173 USF
189 Tulsa
209 Rice
238 UAB
253 ECU
284 UTSA

Non-Con

140 Lipscomb
159 Western Kentucky
340 Coastal Carolina
54 Liberty
213 Saint Louis
191 Norfolk State
89 Richmond
98 Missouri
146 South Dakota State
102 SIU
92 K-State
13 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

30 Dayton
96 VCU

12.24.23

6 FAU
38 Memphis
52 SMU
95 North Texas
102 Charlotte
104 Wichita
126 Tulane
151 USF
192 Tulsa
200 Temple
207 ECU
212 UAB
213 Rice
312 UTSA

Non-Con

142 Lipscomb
145 Western Kentucky
335 Coastal Carolina
49 Liberty
215 Saint Louis
168 Norfolk State
99 Richmond
106 Missouri
204 South Dakota State
87 SIU
85 K-State
15 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

22 Dayton
90 VCU

[forevershockerfan]

Dayton and VCU are solid.

[ShockHat]

God I miss being good.

[WstateU]

God I miss being good.

Not sure about anyone else, but I'm a 'terrible' loser... I still have the bad taste of the K-State game in my system, and will have to live with the eminent pounding coming our way this weekend from the best team money can buy.

Yipes Stripes Beechnut Gum!

Dear,,,

[abdullah_sharif]

damn... the valley is pretty good this year.. five in the top one hundred!

[Shocktoberfest]

So that SIU win was a good win? Weird. Just weird.

[Stickboy46]

So that SIU win was a good win? Weird. Just weird.

Q3 Win for right now.

[Stickboy46]

damn... the valley is pretty good this year.. five in the top one hundred!

Yes and no. While true they have 5 Top 100 teams, 4 of those 5 are bunched in 75-100. So all of those games are Q2 at best or Q3 at worst. ISUb's ranking is pointless. They are a grand total of 0-1 in Q1/Q2 games. They just beat up on some really bad teams. Their ranking will naturally drop as closer conference games happen (and losses). Barring them going undefeated, its unlikely they get a bid. The only way the only teams in the league gets the win they need are by beating ISUb which then makes ISUb fall even faster. So even with "5 Top 100 teams" they are still most likely a 1 bid league.

Ironcially, the AAC is ranked worse as a conference but has an outside shot at 4 bids. FAU and Memphis barring collapses are basically locks for at larges (6-1 vs Q1/Q2 and 7-2 respectively). If SMU can steal a game from each of them and don't drop any turds, they might sneak in as an at large. Then would need a 4th team to win the AAC tourney for the 4th. The AAC ranking is so bad just because the bottom of the league is awful.

[WuDrWu]

The division of "quadrants" is moronic and at worst, criminal. When you have 358 teams, how can beating the #76 team possible be counted as a Q3 win?

Answer: When it benefits the P5 schools.

In other words, beating #76 is barely any different than beating #358 because no one cares about Q3 or Q4.




Quadrants are a joke.

[Aargh]

The division of "quadrants" is moronic and at worst, criminal. When you have 358 teams, how can beating the #76 team possible be counted as a Q3 win?

Answer: When it benefits the P5 schools.

In other words, beating #76 is barely any different than beating #358 because no one cares about Q3 or Q4.




Quadrants are a joke.

This is truth. Margin of win is a worse joke. It encourages embarrassing weaker teams. Quadrants and NET were concessions to the P5 to get the lower 50% - 75% of their teams into the tourney. Going 6-12 in a P5 conference is now good enough for an at large bid. Their losses will mostly be Q1 or Q2 losses and those have become "good losses".

[WstateU]

[SubGod22]

12.24.23

6 FAU
38 Memphis
52 SMU
95 North Texas
102 Charlotte
104 Wichita
126 Tulane
151 USF
192 Tulsa
200 Temple
207 ECU
212 UAB
213 Rice
312 UTSA

Non-Con

142 Lipscomb
145 Western Kentucky
335 Coastal Carolina
49 Liberty
215 Saint Louis
168 Norfolk State
99 Richmond
106 Missouri
204 South Dakota State
87 SIU
85 K-State
15 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

22 Dayton
90 VCU

1.1.24

18 FAU
40 Memphis
47 SMU
94 North Texas
107 Wichita
112 Charlotte
126 Tulane
160 USF
189 Tulsa
201 Temple
215 UAB
225 Rice
239 ECU
289 UTSA

Non-Con

127 Lipscomb
145 Western Kentucky
340 Coastal Carolina
77 Liberty
221 Saint Louis
170 Norfolk State
99 Richmond
102 Missouri
193 South Dakota State
85 SIU
88 K-State
11 Kansas

Non-football eye candy

25 Dayton
87 VCU

[ShockBand]

Wait, shouldn't the "good loss" to the beakers improve our NET ranking? Oh, wait, that's right, we aren't in the "club".

[SubGod22]

Wait, shouldn't the "good loss" to the beakers improve our NET ranking? Oh, wait, that's right, we aren't in the "club".

I believe margin of victory plays a part and that definitely wasn't in our favor.