Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kenny Pohto

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Dan
    replied
    I like having a second lineup of KP, Council, Monzy and Qua. You could make an argument for any of them to start. Plus, Mo leads the team in expressions made after a foul and I hate to mess up his streak by reducing his minutes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Wooglin
    replied
    I like KP coming off the bench. He is pushing for more minutes and I would guess MU feels him breathing down his neck. It should push both players to be better. Until there is a distinct advantage of playing one over the other, I think MU starting and KP nibbling at his minutes is a very good thing.

    Leave a comment:


  • N Crestway
    replied
    At this stage of the season Pohto can still come off the bench. He may be maturing faster than expected but he is still a freshman. Good to have a smart, stable player as the backup while MU works through the problems in his game.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheShocktocles
    replied
    Originally posted by Shock Top View Post
    Bump….. this kid into the starting lineup.
    MU is so unpredictable its better we bring KP off the bench in my opinion. KP brings basketball IQ and shooting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shock Top
    replied
    Bump….. this kid into the starting lineup.

    Leave a comment:


  • WuTheOne
    replied
    Miller's nickname was "Fifi". He overcame that by the time he was a Jr. Hall's nickname was "The Beast". Mo is somewhere behind Fifi right now.

    Leave a comment:


  • asiseeit
    replied
    Agree, not the TO machine Mo is although his hands were not good today. PG's need to get
    passes UP where he is used to catching them. Not all his fault. Mo just needs to play smarter.
    Maybe starting Pohto would make Mo focus but they are both going to spit time. Surely King
    could see he would step right in here and play many minutes at PF/C. He and Pohto would be
    nice together.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinstripers
    replied
    Mo and Carl were both listed at 6'8"

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan
    replied
    Originally posted by ShockTalk View Post

    Mo's upside "could" be Carl Hall, but Mo is no Carl Hall.
    That’s why its called upside

    Leave a comment:


  • Shockm
    replied
    Carl Hall had some explosiveness, and could block shots. Blocking wasn’t his strength, but he was a good rebounder, and led the Final 4 team in rebounding with a 6.8 reb. Average. His backup at the 5 position was EO with a 4.4 average. If we could get 11-12 rebounds from our 5 position this year, I’d be ecstatic.

    Leave a comment:


  • SubGod22
    replied
    Mo has a very long way to go to be Carl Hall. I don't know that he has the desire to really put forth the effort necessary to even approach that level

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by Dan View Post
    MO’s upside is Carl Hall. Kenny’s upside is NBA.
    Mo's upside "could" be Carl Hall, but Mo is no Carl Hall.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dan
    replied
    MO’s upside is Carl Hall. Kenny’s upside is NBA.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockdaWorld
    replied
    I wasn't here much before Turgeon, because that's when I came to Wichita. I can't speak of eras prior to then. That being said, I firmly believe Kenny will be the best Shocker center since I've been a fan. I loved Jaime, but I think Kenny is a few years ahead of him in his development.

    Leave a comment:


  • WuTheOne
    replied
    I'd expect Mo's productivity and efficiency may drop this year. Our PG's aren't "get it to the low post" type of PG's. Pohto's ability to hit from deep might be a better fit with the perimeter personnel on the team this year.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X