Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2020-21 Games of Interest

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SkoShox
    replied
    Yeesh this Oklahoma State team is not the same one that came to Wichita earlier.

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockerFever
    replied
    lol the Peacock would’ve not wanted any part of that.

    Leave a comment:


  • MikeKennedyRulZ
    replied
    Originally posted by another shocker View Post
    juwan howard and mark turgeon throw down.
    Turg would have gotten dusted...

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by Stickboy46 View Post

    Colgate - 2 Seed via NET
    One would think that the committee has to take the "COVID NET" a little suspect in it's accuracy. Of course, if they do, it will probably only help the P5 and hurt everyone else.

    Leave a comment:


  • another shocker
    replied
    juwan howard and mark turgeon throw down.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stickboy46
    replied
    Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post

    USF is now 206 in the NET. So that would have been devastating. Cincy is a little higher but still a Q3 loss. A loss would have me feeling a 35% chance we get in.

    Again, the NET is so idiotic that you can't even tell someone what it measures exactly.
    Colgate - 2 Seed via NET

    Leave a comment:


  • FlyingWheat
    replied
    Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post

    USF is now 206 in the NET. So that would have been devastating. Cincy is a little higher but still a Q3 loss. A loss would have me feeling a 35% chance we get in.

    Again, the NET is so idiotic that you can't even tell someone what it measures exactly.
    And they _specifically_ don’t tell you what they measure, so it’s above reproach or criticism. It is ridiculous. Fairness is never achieved through secret. But that was never the goal.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shock Top
    replied
    SMU is better. They are just rusty.

    Same happened to Baylor.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stickboy46
    replied
    Originally posted by BostonWu View Post
    So does this f'n mean we have to avoid a second bad loss in the tourney?
    Yes it would be a Q3 Loss/Win .. so basically can only hurt us.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kel Varnsen
    replied
    Originally posted by BostonWu View Post
    So does this f'n mean we have to avoid a second bad loss in the tourney?
    USF is now 206 in the NET. So that would have been devastating. Cincy is a little higher but still a Q3 loss. A loss would have me feeling a 35% chance we get in.

    Again, the NET is so idiotic that you can't even tell someone what it measures exactly.

    Leave a comment:


  • pinstripers
    replied
    Originally posted by BostonWu View Post
    So does this f'n mean we have to avoid a second bad loss in the tourney?
    to be sure of a spot, yeah, probably

    Leave a comment:


  • jdmee
    replied
    With this loss does that put SMU on the bubble with UNI?

    Leave a comment:


  • BostonWu
    replied
    So does this f'n mean we have to avoid a second bad loss in the tourney?

    Leave a comment:


  • Rocky Mountain Shock
    replied
    Down by 15 with eight left, SMU is on a ventilator.

    They're going need a shot in the arm to win this.

    (Sorry, I can't help myself.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Maizerunner08
    replied
    SMU is done. Bring on Cincy.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X