Shock Top That tells me the numbers think Furman would have finished better in the American than WSU did, which I think there is little chance that would happen.
I am a big fan of numbers and metrics, but sometimes they can lie. WSU now isn’t the same team that lost to La Tech and Davidson.
I like WSU’s chances as a lot stronger than 25%.
I am a big fan of numbers and metrics, but sometimes they can lie. WSU now isn’t the same team that lost to La Tech and Davidson.
I like WSU’s chances as a lot stronger than 25%.
- Metrics do only provide a snapshot of the whole season, and you are right maybe WSU has grown so much that if they repeated the season they would now be an at-large team. But all the metrics say that Furman is the better team.
WSU ranking in "( )"
NET 41 (83)
RPI 56 (73)
KenPom 56 (93)
BPI 57 (95)
But I wish we knew the weighting they are using for the NET. It really looks like why WSU NET is so much lower than Furman is road record (WSU in "( )'
Road 11-4 (4-7)
Q1 1-5 (1-7)
Q2 3-1 (5-6)
Q3 2-1 (5-1)
Q4 16-0 (8-0)
SOS 180 (60)
Comment