I totally get what you're saying but we both know all too well that if we finish 34-22 (> .600), or anywhere near that, nothing will change.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
WSU vs. Northern Colorado (Game 2)
Collapse
X
-
If we finish with a winning percentage over .600 with this schedule, we will likely have an RPI in the Top 50 and will be in contention for an at-large.
I don't give a **** who the coach is so long as we are getting an at-large bid. That's my minimum threshold for success with the program.
We have not been an at-large worthy team since 2008. Gene failed to get us there in each of his last 5 years. Butler has failed in each of his first 3 - in the unlikely event he gets us over the hump this season, then great, he certainly deserves more time. If we're still stuck counting on the MVC Tournament located everywhere-but-Eck each season, he needs to go and we have to try again to find someone who can return us to the level we enjoyed a decade ago.
Comment
-
I don't think there is any way we get an at-large bid with 34 wins this year. My guess is 34 wins would put us much closer to a 75 RPI than a top 50. It would also require winning the MVC regular season or finishing a close 2nd and I think that will take more than 34 wins unless a large majority of those wins come during conference play. The MVC will probably be ranked between 9th and 12th which is likely a one-bid at-large conference.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shockfan89_ View PostI don't think there is any way we get an at-large bid with 34 wins this year. My guess is 34 wins would put us much closer to a 75 RPI than a top 50. It would also require winning the MVC regular season or finishing a close 2nd and I think that will take more than 34 wins unless a large majority of those wins come during conference play. The MVC will probably be ranked between 9th and 12th which is likely a one-bid at-large conference.Last edited by 1972Shocker; March 16, 2017, 06:47 PM.
Comment
-
Oh I totally agree with you!!! That is a huge improvement. I think the valid point Cdizzle makes is doing that from year 1 to year 2 is showing progress but is 34-22 really good enough after year 4?
There will be plenty of time to talk about that in the off-season. Let's just see how we do over the next 16 games.
Comment
-
Originally posted by shockfan89_ View PostOh I totally agree with you!!! That is a huge improvement. I think the valid point Cdizzle makes is doing that from year 1 to year 2 is showing progress but is 34-22 really good enough after year 4?
Comment
-
Originally posted by shockfan89_ View PostI don't think there is any way we get an at-large bid with 34 wins this year. My guess is 34 wins would put us much closer to a 75 RPI than a top 50. It would also require winning the MVC regular season or finishing a close 2nd and I think that will take more than 34 wins unless a large majority of those wins come during conference play. The MVC will probably be ranked between 9th and 12th which is likely a one-bid at-large conference.
;)
Comment
-
Originally posted by shockfan89_ View PostBut isn't 34-22 a winning percentage of.607? Obviously we would still have the MVC Tournament...
It will definitely depend on where our SoS settles in and whether the MVC has a positive impact again (like last year, 52 OOC SoS and 50 overally SoS). If the SoS settles in closer to 50, I think my original statement stands. If it floats to ~100, then you're right.
Hopefully discussing what it takes for a top 50 RPI is something we can do with a straight face come April/May.
Comment
Comment