In fairness to WSU, this is the fallacy of a tournament format like the one used in the Valley of Even. There's no good reason for a 15-6 team that finishes second to be forced to face the one good pitcher on a 6-15 team that finishes seventh. (That would have been equally as true, by the way, if Illinois St. had lost one game at SIU last weekend and they had been the 15-6 team who ended up seeded second.) Avoiding such foolishness is what byes are for, and if the Valley were remotely competent and wanted its tournament to be something other than a crapshoot that any team has a chance to win, it would use them, just as in the freaking softball tournament, for heaven's sake.
Having said all that, though, what a great microcosm of WSU's season this was.
1. Their best pitcher, who's good but by no means the sort of ace WSU fans have grown accustomed to over the years, lacked consistency all year and failed to show up when it mattered most. Worse, he was beaten by a guy hitting under .200 and one hitting barely over.
2. Their offense -- mediocre, punchless, and inefficient -- showed its customary inability to hit a skillful lefty or even to have much of an approach against him.
3. Their bullpen, the best part of their staff, hung in well but as has happened too often this year, had one guy who didn't hold up his end.
That is not a recipe for success. It's no surprise that this team is 34-26 and teetering. There's still time to recover, but what a steep hill they have to climb, and they aren't great climbers. This is all too much like the baseball counterpart to Randy Smithson's basketball program.
Having said all that, though, what a great microcosm of WSU's season this was.
1. Their best pitcher, who's good but by no means the sort of ace WSU fans have grown accustomed to over the years, lacked consistency all year and failed to show up when it mattered most. Worse, he was beaten by a guy hitting under .200 and one hitting barely over.
2. Their offense -- mediocre, punchless, and inefficient -- showed its customary inability to hit a skillful lefty or even to have much of an approach against him.
3. Their bullpen, the best part of their staff, hung in well but as has happened too often this year, had one guy who didn't hold up his end.
That is not a recipe for success. It's no surprise that this team is 34-26 and teetering. There's still time to recover, but what a steep hill they have to climb, and they aren't great climbers. This is all too much like the baseball counterpart to Randy Smithson's basketball program.
Comment