kc,
"Loosely associated"...........whatever makes you sleep well.
Let me ask you a question. If your 15 (or 16.....I haven't seen any documentation but I haven't looked for it either. If he was 16, is there any chance this took place when the boy was 15? Hmmm) year old daughter was having a sexual relationship with a 40+ year old man, how would you feel? What would your reaction be to the teacher who found out and told her "you're using a condom, right?"?
Would you think there was some coersion involved perhaps? Would you be happy with his reaction?
His reaction wasn't "a poor decision". It was morally reprehensible. I don't care if it happened 20 years ago. Perhaps it would be an extreme reaction to say that because of it he cannot vote, but it is not extreme to say that this dirtbag SHOULD NOT BE SAFE SCHOOL CZAR.
You can continue to spin this anyway you want, but you and I (and anyone else with a functional brain) know damn good and well that when this took place, that Jennings was thrilled to find out about the relationship, did nothing to discourage it (and probably encouraged it further), and believed that it furthered his cause and belief.
In the most simple terms I can find, the fact that he was NOT OUTRAGED and SICKENED by a 15-16 year old (regardless of orientation) having a sexual relationship (where there was obvious issues or he wouldn't have come to the teacher in the first place, right???) with an ADULT should be enough to tell any rational person that Jennings is a bad guy.
Comprende?
You can defend a lot of lefty issues, and one or two may even have merit, but when you come to the defense of a guy like this, you lose all credibility with anyone capable of reasoning.
"Loosely associated"...........whatever makes you sleep well.
Let me ask you a question. If your 15 (or 16.....I haven't seen any documentation but I haven't looked for it either. If he was 16, is there any chance this took place when the boy was 15? Hmmm) year old daughter was having a sexual relationship with a 40+ year old man, how would you feel? What would your reaction be to the teacher who found out and told her "you're using a condom, right?"?
Would you think there was some coersion involved perhaps? Would you be happy with his reaction?
His reaction wasn't "a poor decision". It was morally reprehensible. I don't care if it happened 20 years ago. Perhaps it would be an extreme reaction to say that because of it he cannot vote, but it is not extreme to say that this dirtbag SHOULD NOT BE SAFE SCHOOL CZAR.
You can continue to spin this anyway you want, but you and I (and anyone else with a functional brain) know damn good and well that when this took place, that Jennings was thrilled to find out about the relationship, did nothing to discourage it (and probably encouraged it further), and believed that it furthered his cause and belief.
In the most simple terms I can find, the fact that he was NOT OUTRAGED and SICKENED by a 15-16 year old (regardless of orientation) having a sexual relationship (where there was obvious issues or he wouldn't have come to the teacher in the first place, right???) with an ADULT should be enough to tell any rational person that Jennings is a bad guy.
Comprende?
You can defend a lot of lefty issues, and one or two may even have merit, but when you come to the defense of a guy like this, you lose all credibility with anyone capable of reasoning.
Comment