Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Scalia Dead

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    LOL - never read so much f-ing spin!

    Comment


    • #32
      Paypal co-founder, Gawker destroyer, and Republican Convention prime time speaker Peter Thiel saying Trump has promised to nominate him to replace Scalia if elected.

      Mostly terrifying, a little funny, and probably not worth any more than Trump's prior statements regarding the type of justices he would nominate. Trump campaign quickly denies that this nomination has been promised, but a weird headline nonetheless.

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Play Angry View Post
        Paypal co-founder, Gawker destroyer, and Republican Convention prime time speaker Peter Thiel saying Trump has promised to nominate him to replace Scalia if elected.

        Mostly terrifying, a little funny, and probably not worth any more than Trump's prior statements regarding the type of justices he would nominate. Trump campaign quickly denies that this nomination has been promised, but a weird headline nonetheless.
        So you still reading the huffington post and daily Kos again?

        Comment


        • #34
          This is why it would be foolish for Constitutional Conservatives to trust Trump.

          Evangelicals like James Dobson have tried to convince Pro-lifers that Trump will appoint justices from that list that he released months ago.

          What's more believable, that Trump would appoint justices that would limit him to the constitution or justices that would let him do what he wants?
          "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
          -John Wooden

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by wu_shizzle View Post
            This is why it would be foolish for Constitutional Conservatives to trust Trump.

            Evangelicals like James Dobson have tried to convince Pro-lifers that Trump will appoint justices from that list that he released months ago.

            What's more believable, that Trump would appoint justices that would limit him to the constitution or justices that would let him do what he wants?
            You took that article as serious?
            Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
              You took that article as serious?
              Why wouldn't I, it's not just some HuffPo hit piece.
              "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
              -John Wooden

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by wu_shizzle View Post
                Why wouldn't I, it's not just some HuffPo hit piece.
                That where it started....

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                  That where it started....
                  Yes, but it got picked up. "The Hill" is no friend to Conservatives, but they're not running every hit piece out there.
                  "Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
                  -John Wooden

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by wu_shizzle View Post
                    Yes, but it got picked up. "The Hill" is no friend to Conservatives, but they're not running every hit piece out there.
                    But why did it get picked up is the question to ask? Not because there was any truth - my thinking is because some are getting nervous after Hillary bad week. Couple more of those and Trump might have a chance in winning the election.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                      But why did it get picked up is the question to ask? Not because there was any truth - my thinking is because some are getting nervous after Hillary bad week. Couple more of those and Trump might have a chance in winning the election.
                      And why in the world are we talking about Obama's birth certificate again?

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        . . .
                        Last edited by Shocker-maniac; September 16, 2016, 06:29 PM.
                        ShockerNet is a rat infested cess pool.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X