If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Trump does need to learn to say much less. I’m sure Obama had stupid thoughts, but he had the discipline not to share them with us. What I’m talking about is his statement now that “Russian is no longer targeting the U.S.” please. Of course they are. So are the Chinese. Russia just about dumped all the US bonds
To say that none of this has any bearing on Russia's current provocation's is to keep one's head in the sand. It is absolutely a part of the discussion. Maybe the current US President can gain some headway concerning Iran's presence in Syria, seeing as how they (the Iranians) were emboldened by inaction too. Hell, they've been placated. Man, talk about some serious global consequences for failed foreign policies. Just another reason I didn't want to vote for that Hag who thought those were all good and right policies.
Since your post, the White House has clarified he didn't mean "no, Russia is not targeting the U.S." he instead meant "no, I will not be taking any questions." Despite, the full context being that he said "no." He was asked again to confirm that he thought Russia was not targeting the U.S. and he again said no and that no president has ever been tougher on Russia than he has been.
Honestly, you can't make this stuff up. I am a little surprised it wasn't another "he said, 'no' but he actually meant 'yes'" scenario.
I don’t agree with how Trump handled the joint statement to the media at Helsinki. However, a comparison to Obama is like comparing apples and oranges. Everything that Trump does is magnified by the media. The media never investigated things Obama or his administration did below the surface to any depth. They “surface” reported the mistakes but never followed up with major critical statements. When a Republican called him a “traitor” or called out “he lied” (Steve King from Iowa) during his speech, the Republican was confronted by the media but Obama wasn’t criticized or analyzed in depth. When John Brennan just called Trump a “traitor”, he received zero criticism. Trump received all of the critical analysis.
What if red china got a hold of Hillary's private server -ahem- "business dealings?"
Did national intelligence have knowledge of this, but didn't want to derail the Hildabeast's ambitious designs, seeing as how she was such a lock? Does our President know this, thus his disdain on foreign soil? Hey, one never knows...
jdshock, positive consent is required every step of the way.
It’s a progressive sexual consent requirement, otherwise it’s rape. You have to continually ask/give an affirmative all the way to copulation otherwise it’s rape. If you misinterpret Trumps yes/no response, you’re raping him politically...bad joke.
Given that the left's MO is to project accusations onto their enemies, precisely what they themselves do, I believe that the democrats colluded with Russia.
It's pretty simple. Apply it to every accusation a dem makes and it is usually true.
Obama told his team to stand down on stopping the hack.
Clintons took money and sold Uranium.
Brennan, a person who voted for a commie, CIA director.
Obama's "I'll have more flexibility" comment.
It all makes sense. All of the Dems hysteria is a direct result of their projecting their own values onto their enemy. They live in fear of being found out when they are in power. Once they lose power, they start to accuse others of their trangressions.
They fear Trump being a tyrant, because they intended to be tyrants in power.
They accuse everyone of being racists, while seeing the world through racial eyes.
Doesn't matter. Whenever they cry foul, its because they've done it before and fear the reciprocal action.
"When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Better have some sugar and water too, or else your lemonade will suck!
True but one thing that's more evident now than ever is that just because the media has told us that doesn't make it true, same going for the government. There's been so much fog in all of this, that no matter what your political leanings are, it is hard to discern what is BS and what is truth anymore because no matter what you tune into or read, there is always an agenda behind it. True journalism is dead. I don't know if I buy the whole Russian bot and staging rallies story, I think there is a genuine, strong support President Trump has, especially with the working class.
If there is any collusion going on to manipulate an election, it would be with the Democrats who are hellbent on importing illegal aliens and "refugees" for their votes in the exchange of goodies for decades now. Oh, and if you dare question it, and prefer that immigrants come legally and that we take in sustainable levels, you're painted into a heartless racist. It's why Trump won. People are tired of identity politics that was the holy religion of the Obama era.
There were several rallies that were staged by a couple of Russians in Florida. Literally DOZENS of supporters showed up. It happened. It was orchestrated by Russian citizens posing as Americans, and in total, fewer people showed up at all of those combined that the number that show up at a single PTO meeting in McPherson.
Deal with the facts. They tell you everything you need to know.
I'm actually pretty sure neither of those things are treason, if we're talking about US citizens asking for Congress to go through impeachment proceedings or something like that.
What we're talking about is using -ahem- "russian intelligence" as a catalyst to spy on the sitting President of our nation for, unbelievably, questionable russian connections. Yeah, but in this case they can be trusted. Really.
Because, hey, why bother verifying it? Hell, that document couldn't be given away for free at one time
I think Trump is clear on his objectives - crystal clear.
I think Trump is an old man and sometimes makes mistakes; mistakes that are further exacerbated by his fluid style of management and communication (see: undisciplined).
I think Trump is trying to troll the mainstream media until their heads explode.
Bots first entered the 2016 election cycle by crowding into social media channels. Without any direct coordination with campaigns, the snippets of code were spewing out rank partisan propaganda. Even a novice programmer could slap one together, and start choking off a reasonable conversation on Twitter and comment boards. By the second presidential debate, they were taking over the conversation: a Oxford...
"When life hands you lemons, make lemonade." Better have some sugar and water too, or else your lemonade will suck!
It seems they are capitalizing on "identity politics" doesn't it? Facebook is the perfect alleyway to go down to get that message out. I'll bet Whoopi gets her news from Facebook.
New claims for unemployment benefits fell 8,000 to 207,000 in the second week of July, the Department of Labor reported Thursday morning, the lowest such number since 1969. Forecasters had expected new jobless claims to edge up to around 220,000. Instead, fewer people sought unemployment insurance than anytime in 48 years. Thursday's benchmark is especially
..." a lot of people out there with two jobs."
The Libbies are in big ass trouble. Election outcomes are primarily based on what the voter's wallet feels like. People better be preparing themselves for a near 80 yr old Trump in the White House. Never mind impeachment, with an economy like this you couldn't blow Big Don out of Washington with a Russian nuclear warhead.
After submitting its 2016 Certifications in September 2016, the Department of Justice and ODNI learned, in October 2016, about additional information related to previously reported compliance incidents and reported that additional information to the FISC. The NSA also self-reported the...
Comment