Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ShockTalk
    replied
    Originally posted by RoyalShock View Post
    I will first say, I'm not a fan of Trump. Didn't vote for him, and still won't. But in no way was he going to get a fair trial in NY. No way did the jury take their job seriously and deliberate each count. The judge is absolutely trying to influence an election by setting sentencing four days prior to the GOP convention.

    And in all likelihood, he's now going to get elected. But I have no idea how this will play out Constitutionally if the conviction holds after what will certainly be a lengthy appeals process.
    I'm just going to throw this out there only because you are the first one on this board to say what I highlighted. I say this as someone who did not vote for Trump the first time (voted 3rd party). I feel we are at a crossroads as a nation and of our freedoms. This was a politically cooked up trial. It was created and condoned by Trump's political foes. If one is now not voting for Trump, I feel you are condoning what just happened as "business as usual" by the Democrat party. It needs to be stopped at the polls. We may not be able to stop it otherwise in the future.

    Leave a comment:


  • RoyalShock
    replied
    I will first say, I'm not a fan of Trump. Didn't vote for him, and still won't. But in no way was he going to get a fair trial in NY. No way did the jury take their job seriously and deliberate each count. The judge is absolutely trying to influence an election by setting sentencing four days prior to the GOP convention.

    And in all likelihood, he's now going to get elected. But I have no idea how this will play out Constitutionally if the conviction holds after what will certainly be a lengthy appeals process.

    Leave a comment:


  • 1972Shocker
    replied
    Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
    12 hours of deliberation. Man, they didn't have their minds made up lol. I spent 2 weeks in deliberation in a unemployment fraud case.

    We live in bizarro world times. I'm not sure there is a way out.
    The only reason they spent 12 hours was to make it seem like they were deliberating. No way anyone on that jury was going to go against the grain, not if they want to continue living in Manhattan.

    Leave a comment:


  • WuDrWu
    replied
    And there's the quote:

    "The real verdict will be Nov. 5 by the people."

    Leave a comment:


  • WuDrWu
    replied
    12 hours of deliberation. Man, they didn't have their minds made up lol. I spent 2 weeks in deliberation in a unemployment fraud case.

    We live in bizarro world times. I'm not sure there is a way out.

    Leave a comment:


  • shoxlax
    replied
    Originally posted by 1972Shocker View Post
    The jury has reached a verdict in the New York hush-money star chamber Not yet announced.

    My guess is guilty.

    Verdict: Guilty on all 34 counts. Now what he is guilty of is still somewhat of a mystery.
    Was there a bump in the polls for him after that verdict?

    Leave a comment:


  • 1972Shocker
    replied
    The jury has reached a verdict in the New York hush-money star chamber Not yet announced.

    My guess is guilty.

    Verdict: Guilty on all 34 counts. Now what he is guilty of is still somewhat of a mystery.
    Last edited by 1972Shocker; May 30, 2024, 05:13 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • WstateU
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • pinstripers
    replied
    Ryan Fournier @RyanAFournier

    Trump has 81 million followers on Twitter. Biden has 36 million. Trump hasn’t been on here since 2021 and you expect me to believe Joe somehow got 81 million votes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Shockm
    replied
    Trump is trying to change his image maybe? I always thought half of his image was put on purposefully, by him. Trump went from a bully (calling others names like he likes to do) with his own past supporters a couple of weeks ago, where he wanted to keep others from running to now, putting on a less bullying image, after Ron DeSanctomonious kind of put him in his place. I think he will wear people out pretty quickly, and lose even more support, if he continues with his past name calling ways. He actually started his race too soon imo, to keep the momentum for two years. We will see if it lasts.

    Mike Pompeo was totally loyal to Trump at one time, but he's now he's flexing his individual muscle a little. Even he is bringing out the knives a little, and showing a little Presidential ambition. He was quoted just after the midterms that he thought elections would change, and mentioned that Kansas had elected a Democrat Governor with a dominating Republican State legislature. I'm sure he still has some political friends in Kansas from his past.

    https://www.kansas.com/news/politics...268924107.html

    Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday fired a warning shot at former President Donald Trump, indicating he believed the former president was responsible for the Republican Party losing elections. “We were told we’d get tired of winning. But I’m tired of losing,” Pompeo wrote. “And so are most Republicans.” Though it did not mention Trump by name, it references a famous line Trump used on the campaign trail in 2016, when he would tell the crowd at his rallies that “we’re gonna win so much, you may even get tired of winning.” His comments came ahead of a speech at the Republican Jewish Coalition’s annual leadership meeting.

    Read more at: https://www.kansas.com/news/politics...#storylink=cpy

    Leave a comment:


  • pinstripers
    replied
    https://twitter.com/RyanAFournier/st...01070812307456

    Trump's final posts

    Leave a comment:


  • WstateU
    replied


    Leave a comment:


  • pinstripers
    replied
    Interesting opinion from her

    Leave a comment:


  • ShockerPrez
    replied
    Unplug

    Leave a comment:


  • C0|dB|00ded
    replied


    Stephanie Grisham says Trump greatly admired Putin and 'wanted to be able to kill whoever spoke out against him'

    Former White House press secretary Stephanie Grisham said on Tuesday that former President Donald Trump both feared and admired Russian President Vladimir Putin.

    "Honestly, I think he feared him. I think he was afraid of him. I think the man intimidated him," Grisham said during an appearance on "The View," when asked about Trump's impression of Putin.

    "I also think he admired him greatly," Grisham said. "I think he wanted to be able to kill whoever spoke out against him."

    "In my experience with him, again, I'll just say — he loved the dictators. He loved the people who could kill anyone, including the press," she added. In 2017, The Washington Post reported on 10 vocal critics of Putin who had died violently or under suspicious circumstances.
    Crazy to read, but believable. Grisham was an ardent loyalist up until the very end (Her resignation Jan. 6th).

    Here's an older article on Grisham detailing more about her book:



    ‘I Was Part of Something Unusually Evil’

    In Kansas with Stephanie Grisham, who does not believe she will be redeemed.
    Hangin' out in Plainville, Ks......

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X