Since the topic has changed anyway, I will ask a question that I think creates an interesting discussion around the abortion issue.
My understanding of in vitro fertilization is that a handful of eggs are fertilized, but several will be put into storage for later. Usually this is so that it's cheaper if the parents decide to pursue IVF a second time or if the first one doesn't take.
Is IVF unacceptable for the same reasons abortion is? i.e., there are fertilized eggs that do not reach their potential of life?
If IVF is acceptable, what is the key difference and the justification that a pre-viability fetus is a life but the fertilized egg is not?
My understanding of in vitro fertilization is that a handful of eggs are fertilized, but several will be put into storage for later. Usually this is so that it's cheaper if the parents decide to pursue IVF a second time or if the first one doesn't take.
Is IVF unacceptable for the same reasons abortion is? i.e., there are fertilized eggs that do not reach their potential of life?
If IVF is acceptable, what is the key difference and the justification that a pre-viability fetus is a life but the fertilized egg is not?
Comment