Imminent Terrorist Attack Warning By Feds on US Border

[SB Shock]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulletins/imminent-terrorist-attack-warning-feds-us-border/

Islamic terrorist groups are operating in the Mexican border city of Ciudad Juarez and planning to attack the United States with car bombs or other vehicle born improvised explosive devices (VBIED). High-level federal law enforcement, intelligence and other sources have confirmed to Judicial Watch that a warning bulletin for an imminent terrorist attack on the border has been issued. Agents across a number of Homeland Security, Justice and Defense agencies have all been placed on alert and instructed to aggressively work all possible leads and sources concerning this imminent terrorist threat.

Meanwhile UK raised it terror threat to to "severe" - which indicate attack is "highly likely"

[MoValley John]

Wait a minute. I thought all of the border area violence and beheadings in Mexico was because of Catholics who happened to also sell drugs, not Islamic terrorists infiltrating already violent drug cartels. What gives?

[Dave Stalwart]

And so it begins?

Our bad decisions are going to catch up with us...

[Kung Wu]

http://www.judicialwatch.org/bulleti...eds-us-border/



Meanwhile UK raised it terror threat to to "severe" - which indicate attack is "highly likely"

That's racist.

[Dave Stalwart]

I can't imagine being a border security worker... Sitting in a specific spot/gate...Checking vehicles... And you just got warned that you should keep an eye out for vehicle born improvised explosives and car bombs...

[SB Shock]

That's racist.

I heard holder sent a message to the border patrol that if anybody "profile" they will be prosecuted for civil right violations.

[Kung Wu]

When 9/11 happened the entire country rallied around Bush, and Bush responded exactly the way Americans hoped he would. If the Muslims attack our country again by penetrating the Mexican border, will our country rally around Obama? How could they? He and the Democrats are 100% to blame for allowing it to happen by not securing the border. This is a sad situation that won't be resolved until another president takes office and cleans up Obama's serious mess.

If an attack is imminent -- and I hope to God it's not -- then please let it happen before the elections so that the uneducated Democrat voters will understand that elections have consequences. Electing a weak, ignorant, arrogant, Marxist has serious negative consequences. Of course if it happens before the elections, the idiot portion of the Democrat base will blindly vote D as an effort to rally around the man who invited the attackers with open arms -- because they are too stupid to see the obvious.

Probably better it happens after the elections. Then at least the country will kick the Dems out of the presidency so hard the picture of Obama in the White House will fall off the wall.

****

And in other news. If Russians can steal a quarter of the populations usernames/passwords and break deep into the largest banks of America, how good do you feel about them not being able to break into a large subset of the voting machines and swing substantial numbers of votes to whatever candidate they perceive as the weakest is?

[Dave Stalwart]

When 9/11 happened the entire country rallied around Bush, and Bush responded exactly the way Americans hoped he would. If the Muslims attack our country again by penetrating the Mexican border, will our country rally around Obama? How could they? He and the Democrats are 100% to blame for allowing it to happen by not securing the border. This is a sad situation that won't be resolved until another president takes office and cleans up Obama's serious mess.

If an attack is imminent -- and I hope to God it's not -- then please let it happen before the elections so that the uneducated Democrat voters will understand that elections have consequences. Electing a weak, ignorant, arrogant, Marxist has serious negative consequences. Of course if it happens before the elections, the idiot portion of the Democrat base will blindly vote D as an effort to rally around the man who invited the attackers with open arms -- because they are too stupid to see the obvious.

Probably better it happens after the elections. Then at least the country will kick the Dems out of the presidency so hard the picture of Obama in the White House will fall off the wall.

****

And in other news. If Russians can steal a quarter of the populations usernames/passwords and break deep into the largest banks of America, how good do you feel about them not being able to break into a large subset of the voting machines and swing substantial numbers of votes to whatever candidate they perceive as the weakest is?

It's interesting to me because I've noticed that many of the people I know who are conspiracy theorists about the U.S. always doing things in an effort to go to war or get oil or whatever (such as "staging" 9/11 or "faking" the existence of weapons of mass destruction) are also generally the same people who support Obama blindly or even further, openly want things like socialism.

Well, anyway, you can try to pin things on Bush that are somewhat convoluted and debatable and allow yourself to blame him for all our problems. On the other hand, this particular situation is completely and utterly a result of actual identifiable weakness and/or intention. It's way less debatable than the things people used to (and still) blame Bush for. I wonder if people will be willing to admit it.

For many Democrats, they need to realize that it's okay to admit a guy wasn't so hot. It doesn't mean all democrats do a bad job, but many seem to treat it like if they bail on him it means more than it really does. Others will come along whom I disagree with on policy, but they won't literally wreck the country. That's okay, but what is happening here isn't. You can't look at what is happening and act like he did a good job here... And you definitely can't act like anything Bush did was worse than this. Allowing terrorists to enter the country freely and undocumented for months will have serious implications.

[shocka khan]

Wait a minute. I thought all of the border area violence and beheadings in Mexico was because of Catholics who happened to also sell drugs, not Islamic terrorists infiltrating already violent drug cartels. What gives?

I know that you live in Omaha (must be the water, you remind me of some Creighton fans for some odd reason), or is it that or the fact that you live in Nebraska (where the N on the helmet stands for knowledge) that makes you so stupid?

When you have family in Mexico, travel extensively in Mexico or through some stroke of luck start reading something other than John Bircher publications like World News Daily, get back with me.

[MoValley John]

I know that you live in Omaha (must be the water, you remind me of some Creighton fans for some odd reason), or is it that or the fact that you live in Nebraska (where the N on the helmet stands for knowledge) that makes you so stupid?

When you have family in Mexico, travel extensively in Mexico or through some stroke of luck start reading something other than John Bircher publications like World News Daily, get back with me.

Nice ad hominem. When people have nothing, they often reduce arguments to ad hominems. Anyway, you were the one that blamed the violence and beheadings in Mexico on Catholics, remember? I pointed out, before this latest information, that it was the drug cartels and Muslims engaging in the violence. I posted links, none of which were from World News Daily, or any other "Bircher" publication. I am proving to be right, so I can expect another barrage of ad hominems. It should be fun.

[SB Shock]

Pope is being tagerted. Italy is stepping up security. ISLAM - religion of peace

[MoValley John]

For those late to the party, here is the exact quote where shaka kahn blamed beheadings in Mexico on Catholics (emphasis mine).


You conservative Christian drama queens are keeping me in stitches today. The REAL reason our 'wonderful Christians' don't go around murdering more abortion doctors isn't because Christians have such good self-control, it's because of society's norms and the rule of law.

Look at what some good catholic (99% of Mexicans are Catholic) just did:
http://www.borderlandbeat.com/2014/0...-of-zetas.html

There have been a number of beheadings in Tamulipas this week, probably some of them who spend a great deal of money on their burial sites (some of them are very elaborate) as a testament to their religion. Unfortunately, it does not stop them from murdering their competition (and the police) . They just go to confession and have the priest forgive them for their sins.

Of course, Mexico's legal system is for sale. That's why many practicing catholics who are cartel members think nothing of cutting the heads off their enemies.

I agree with the opinions posted here by others. Shia's who control ISIS hate Sunnis and are butchering them as well. MoValleyJohn, how do you know that all Muslims do not condone the behavior of ISIS. I bet the Sunnis hate them. I bet they condone that behavior. I'm not going to make unequivocal statements like you did, I would ask you provide something more than antecodtal information (i.e. polls statistics or facts) to back up your contentions about Muslims in Detroit supporting ISIS. Not all of them do. MoValleyJohn also conveniently forgets to inform us that Robert E. Lee apprehended John Brown and his assistants who attacked a federal ammunition depot, he was tried in a slave state and was sentenced to death by hanging. Kind of hard for an abolitionist to get sympathy in a slave state, that's an easy point to make.

I think there are peaceful, law-abiding muslims who totally disagree with ISIS.

I think that religion is a great tool to use by society to enforce norms and behavior standards. I think there are peaceful, law-abiding muslims who I think it is a useful sociological platform to guide everyone's behavior.

Unfortunately, I've seen too many Christians who can quote the bible but don't live by its values. I'm enjoying the comments and I'm having fun watching you validate my opinion about how people don't live their faith actively. Many of you who have responded to me negatively can talk the talk, but not walk the walk.

Now, I'll just get my popcorn and watch you folks attack me again. And get a good laugh out of it.

[MoValley John]

Now, to dig deeper into his post. According to the website shaka kahn provided, there are beheadings taking place in Mexico. Nowhere in the linked article does it mention Catholics. It did mention drug cartels. Hmmm, so either shaka kahn has more information than he posted, or he just jumped to a conclusion based on nothing. He also mentioned that Mexico is 99% Catholic. Once again, he was wrong. According to www.religionfacts.com Mexico is 76.5% Catholic. At one time, Mexico was near 90% Catholic, but not anymore. That number is dropping by the day, while Islam is slowly gaining.

As to my assertions that the beheadings and violence increases were due in part to radical Islam is to infiltrating drug cartels and teaching violence, I posted several right leaning, but credible reports. This was further backed by the report that precipitated this thread. However, in order to be fair, I will post a few more threads that maybe, just maybe, shaka kahn will accept.

From 2011: http://www.businessinsider.com/lulzs...cartels-2011-7

Another: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...o-us/?page=all

I could post much more, but why?

Needless to say, shaka kahn ended his tyrade with a comment about people that don't agree with him attacking him. Well, nobody has attacked him, I have simply disagreed and refuted him. Now, he doesn't like the fact that he was wrong, so he attacks me. I can live with that. I'd rather be right and attacked, than wrong and be a fool.

[DUShock]

Carpet bombing solves a lot of problems, not all of them but a lot of them.

[SB Shock]

For those who know their WW2 history will recall that George C. Marshall asked a unknown, recently promoted Brigadier Army who was the Army Chief of Staff to develop draft a strategic concept to deal with Japan 5 days after pearl harbor. A few hours later Marshall received the strategic concept and agreed with it.

Then Chief of State was then asked for a memorandum to outline the strategy that the Allies should pursue - this became the template for the next 3 years of the war. This strategy was developed in only a few days. This strategy provided the actions to keep all the allies in the war and maintain the coalition with ultimately a attack through france. . This unknown General was Eisenhower.

63 years later we get.....


Obama ---

We don't have a strategy yet

White House press secretary wanted to make clear

White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest told interviewers today that the U.S. in "not at war" with ISIS

I guess they are waiting for their equivalent Pearl Harbor....