Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Will the National Media Run with this Story?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Simply put, guns aren't an issue. "Gun control" hasn't done anything for gun violence except increase it because good people can't defend themselves.
    Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
    RIP Guy Always A Shocker
    Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
    ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
    Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
    Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
      Right on cue '79. You're right, it's about guns. How have tougher gun laws worked in Australia? Detroit? Chicago?

      Yep, it's all about the guns. So glad you pointed that out to us! You're a hero!
      yeah, I'm sure these guys got their gun due to lax brackground checks

      We also know there are no murders in Australia with guns.

      Sydney – Police in Australia have charged two people with the murder of a India-born businessman last month.
      A 27-year-old woman and a 32-year-old man were arrested and charged Tuesday with the murder of Shyam Dhody July 5, local media reported.
      Dhody, 37, was shot dead while he was on his bed in his home at Gilston, a suburb of Gold Coast city in the Australian state of Queensland July 5.
      I'm still waiting for Sharpton to demand that Holder investigate these kids for violating the australian civil rights and charge them with a hate crime.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
        I'm still waiting for Sharpton to demand that Holder investigate these kids for violating the australian civil rights and charge them with a hate crime.
        Nonimmigrant aliens generally may not purchase or possess firearms or ammunition.

        It would not surprise me if Holder is researching whether he can sue Lane's parents because Lane was in illegal possession of ammunition.
        Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
          Right on cue '79. You're right, it's about guns. How have tougher gun laws worked in Australia? Detroit? Chicago?

          Yep, it's all about the guns. So glad you pointed that out to us! You're a hero!
          I need some help here. In the link I posted above, could you show me the quote where it says that I, 1979Shocker, said "it's all about the guns." Unless you're saying that I'm actually this Tim Fischer mentioned in the story.

          You're going to have a hard time knowing anything about me if you're associating every link I post with what I believe. I only post links because they're related to the topic, nothing more, nothing less.

          Comment


          • #20
            Gotcha. And I only go to Twin Peaks for the cold beer. You got it.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
              You're going to have a hard time knowing anything about me if you're associating every link I post with what I believe. I only post links because they're related to the topic, nothing more, nothing less.
              Can you point us to a SINGLE link that you have posted over the years regarding any political topic that wasn't pushing a liberal viewpoint? There may be one, but I doubt it. So when (nearly or exactly) every single link you have ever posted on any political topic has a headline or content pushing a liberal viewpoint, what other conclusion should a thinking person draw?

              I'm not complaining _one bit_ about you doing that by the way. Everyone is definitely welcome to share their view or further the argument with viewpoints that they identify with. Just don't deny that the reason you are posting leftist viewpoints -- and ONLY leftist viewpoints -- is because you align with those viewpoints. Otherwise you are being disingenuous and think we are stupid.
              Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

              Comment


              • #22
                And no, I am not Glenn McCoy. I only posted this because it's related to the topic, nothing more, nothing less.
                Attached Files

                Comment


                • #23
                  The persons in the video are purported to be the father and sister of one of the ALLEGED criminals.

                  8/21/13 - The sister of James Edwards, one of the suspected killers of Aussie baseball star Chris Lane, blamed the community of Duncan for her brother's cold...


                  I am only posting this because it's related to the topic. Nothing more, nothing less.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                    Can you point us to a SINGLE link that you have posted over the years regarding any political topic that wasn't pushing a liberal viewpoint? There may be one, but I doubt it. So when (nearly or exactly) every single link you have ever posted on any political topic has a headline or content pushing a liberal viewpoint, what other conclusion should a thinking person draw?

                    I'm not complaining _one bit_ about you doing that by the way. Everyone is definitely welcome to share their view or further the argument with viewpoints that they identify with. Just don't deny that the reason you are posting leftist viewpoints -- and ONLY leftist viewpoints -- is because you align with those viewpoints. Otherwise you are being disingenuous and think we are stupid.
                    If, as you say, I aligned with ONLY leftist viewpoints, then that must mean I'm all for abortions. As I've said in other posts in the past, while most on the right are pro-life when it comes to the unborn, that's where it stops for them. They're pro-life at the start of life. I'm pro-life from birth until death. And it's not just pro-life for people in this country, but pro-life for all of humanity.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
                      If, as you say, I aligned with ONLY leftist viewpoints, then that must mean I'm all for abortions. As I've said in other posts in the past, while most on the right are pro-life when it comes to the unborn, that's where it stops for them. They're pro-life at the start of life. I'm pro-life from birth until death. And it's not just pro-life for people in this country, but pro-life for all of humanity.
                      So you've posted a link in the past to an article that espouses a pro-life argument?
                      Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
                        I'm pro-life from birth until death.
                        So If I understand this statement correct - you are for abortion. Because if you were against abortion it would read "I'm pro-life from conception until death.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          The insinuation that Republicans, conservatives, Tea Party members, or anyone on the right ISN'T pro-life from birth to death is insulting, demeaning and a flat out lie. Of course, lying is the benchmark of the Democratic platform. Without lying, they really have nothing with which to debate.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by WuDrWu View Post
                            The insinuation that Republicans, conservatives, Tea Party members, or anyone on the right ISN'T pro-life from birth to death is insulting, demeaning and a flat out lie. Of course, lying is the benchmark of the Democratic platform. Without lying, they really have nothing with which to debate.
                            I don't have a dog in the fight, but I really hate when people demonize the other side. You can't really believe that half of our country is just lying. You can have different opinions from someone without it having to be something sinister.

                            As for the first point, you can't be on the right without being pro-life? According to a Gallup poll from May, 26% of both Republicans and conservatives are pro-choice: http://www.gallup.com/poll/162548/am...ion-views.aspx ... Just as 31% of Democrats are pro-life.

                            No political issue is ever black and white. Debate and disagreement are good.
                            Last edited by Rlh04d; August 24, 2013, 06:02 PM.
                            Originally posted by BleacherReport
                            Fred VanVleet on Shockers' 3-Pt Shooting Confidence -- ' Honestly, I just tell these guys to let their nuts hang.'

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
                              So you've posted a link in the past to an article that espouses a pro-life argument?
                              No, I didn't know that was a requirement for being pro-life. I haven't, as far as I know, posting any link for one side or the other.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by SB Shock View Post
                                So If I understand this statement correct - you are for abortion. Because if you were against abortion it would read "I'm pro-life from conception until death.
                                No, you didn't read it right, but the last of your sentence would be correct though. I'll try to remember that next time so it's clear to everyone.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X