For context, in 2020 Dems had 78% of the mail-in votes in PA.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
2024 Presidential Election
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by ABC View PostThe early vote #s for the GOP all over the country have been surprising. Including Kansas.
A question is if the early votes are "cannibalizing" day-of voting. I would guess some, but not all.
Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Just waiting for the 3:00 AM vote dump of hundreds of thousands of democrat votes.An “Old West” Texas analysis and summary of Mueller report and Congress’ efforts in one sentence:
"While we recognize that the subject did not actually steal any horses, he is obviously guilty of trying to resist being hanged for it."
Comment
-
Here is what feels true to me:
The R walk in vote will exceed the D walk in vote in all battleground states.
Based on that assumption then:
1) If Trump is already winning the early vote in a battleground state, he has likely already won it.
2) Just because Trump is losing the early vote in a battleground state, doesn't mean he is going to lose it.
That's a helluva good position to be in, if you're Trump.
If that's right then:
PA: Harris (61% to 30%)
NC: Tied - Declared winner by KW
GA: Trump (49% to 45%) - Declared winner by KW
AZ: Trump (42% to 36%) - Declared winner by KW
WI: Harris (36% to 22%) [way too early to make sense of]
MI: Harris (52% to 38%)
NV: Trump (40% to 36%) - Declared winner by KW
If any of this admitted poppy-cock were true, then Trump could lose PA and would only need one of MI or WI to win ... here's that map:
image.pngKung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
There's absolutely no question that a big portion of the GOP early voting is cannibalizing the vote on election day itself. My guess is 95% or more.
That being said, a greater early vote does allow the "ground game" to narrow their focus on those that haven't voted or need to be encouraged at the last minute. Resources are limited, so the more names they can check off the list (as already voted) makes getting one more "maybe" that much more likely.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Justification for premise above ...
In 2020 ... Pennsylvania (PA)- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~24%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~76%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~30%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~70%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~36%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~64%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~42%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~58%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~28%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~72%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~26%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~74%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~38%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~62%
Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by WuDrWu View PostThere's absolutely no question that a big portion of the GOP early voting is cannibalizing the vote on election day itself. My guess is 95% or more.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View PostJustification for premise above ...
In 2020 ... Pennsylvania (PA)- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~24%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~76%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~30%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~70%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~36%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~64%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~42%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~58%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~28%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~72%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~26%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~74%
- Democratic Walk-in Votes: ~38%
- Republican Walk-in Votes: ~62%
"I'm goin' drop muh vote off personally so those damned liberuls don't switch me to Kamabala BloJoB QuEEn!!!111
Or... it could just be that the average age of early voters skew VERY old for the Trumpers. Lost a lot of 'em in the pandemic from medical retardation/misinformation tho.
Comment
-
Originally posted by C0|dB|00ded View PostLost a lot of 'em in the pandemic from medical retardation/misinformation tho.Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post
This part is true. The folks at the CDC that were telling people they were safe by social distancing 6 ft and wearing any old mask, probably killed a ton of people.
As far as masks are concerned.......
Mask limits infection.. period. Better masks do it better, but some face covering will limit the "viral dose" received lowering the probability of severe outcomes... PERIOD. PERIOD. PERIOD. FFS... >>> !PERIOD! <<<.
As the science around the novel virus improved, so did the guidance. This is not DISinformation, it's merely wrong, in an honest fashion. What the Trumpers were spreading was DISinformation. And they are truly responsible for 100's of thousands of deaths IMO. I will believe that until the day I die. I saw the confusion and subsequent bad outcomes with my very own eyes. Terribly sad... evil.
And now we find ourselves in a country where half the population distrust their own doctor. THAT is going to lead to more unnecessary deaths.
Most people truly have NO idea the impact Trump has had on the life expectancy of his own followers. And they will gladly walk off the side of a cliff for him yet today. Mind-blowingly sad.
Comment
Comment