Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Lock Him Up!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by ShockerPrez View Post
    I have so many questions about nuclear weapons docs...

    Its just too perfect. And before we actually get the facts, half the lemmings and media will already believe he sold them to Putin.

    I guess we shall see. I would think that it would be easy to get Trump on one of these millions of crimes he's perpetrated against the American people.
    You never now what the FBI might plant.

    Comment


    • #17
      Is it allowable to bar the lawyers of the warranted person from the property during the search? Seems like you should be allowed to have an observer to protect against found play.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rrshock View Post
        Is it allowable to bar the lawyers of the warranted person from the property during the search? Seems like you should be allowed to have an observer to protect against found play.
        That actually didn't happen - there was a Trump lawyer on the grounds, but she was restricted from going into the parts of the facility where the FBI agents were conducting the search (and that is normal during an execution of search warrant).

        Comment


        • #19
          When I am president, the FBI will raid the homes of my political enemies.

          SB really got Trump here. Just like with "Russian collusion"...
          "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

          Comment


          • #20


            "In God we trust, all others must bring data." - W. Edwards Deming

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Kel Varnsen View Post


              To be fair, Stormy Daniels did happen.
              Livin the dream

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by SB Shock View Post

                That actually didn't happen - there was a Trump lawyer on the grounds, but she was restricted from going into the parts of the facility where the FBI agents were conducting the search (and that is normal during an execution of search warrant).
                Is this true? What's the point of being present if you cannot observe?

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by pinstripers View Post

                  Is this true? What's the point of being present if you cannot observe?
                  To be served the warrant and then sign the receipt for the evidence collected.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Trump could murder someone in broad daylight at the 50 yard line during a televised NFL game and I'm quite certain there are folks on this board who would find a way to blame the left and claim his innocence.
                    Shocker fan for life after witnessing my first game in person, the 80-74 win over the #12 Creighton Bluejays at the Kansas Coliseum.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by Ta Town Shocker View Post
                      Trump could murder someone in broad daylight at the 50 yard line during a televised NFL game and I'm quite certain there are folks on this board who would find a way to blame the left and claim his innocence.
                      Because it was self-defense, due to a leftist kook attacking him. So obvious.
                      Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by Ta Town Shocker View Post
                        Trump could murder someone in broad daylight at the 50 yard line during a televised NFL game and I'm quite certain there are folks on this board who would find a way to blame the left and claim his innocence.
                        Let me ask this, Do you believe the Russians had a pee tape of Trump that they were using to blackmail him?

                        Iā€™m pretty sure that was Democrat oppositional research that was given to the FBI in order to investigate him by the feds and the legislative branch of government so they could win power.

                        Now, let me ask this, if they did it once, without consequence, do you think they would do it again?
                        Livin the dream

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by wufan View Post

                          Let me ask this, Do you believe the Russians had a pee tape of Trump that they were using to blackmail him?

                          Iā€™m pretty sure that was Democrat oppositional research that was given to the FBI in order to investigate him by the feds and the legislative branch of government so they could win power.

                          Now, let me ask this, if they did it once, without consequence, do you think they would do it again?
                          I'm not trying to defend the left at all. From what little I've read about Garland on the WSJ, he's nothing but scum. I come to this board to seek out objective opinions and thoroughly enjoy the content from most threads, regardless of whether or not I agree with every post. I frequently hit the like button on many posts with differing viewpoints. That said, I feel there is quite a bit of blind support for Trump in this thread and not calling you out specifically. I didn't see the op but it appears you called out a piece of disinformation earlier.

                          I'm not a Trump supporter. I simply don't like the guy. He's had his fair share of personal moral shortcomings in my opinion. I went to listen to him when he was campaigning in Wichita and wasn't impressed with his speech in the least. My view is he's nothing more than a media whore who used the attention to propel himself into the presidency. Several call him a genius for doing so but I don't see it that way.

                          I caught a snippet of an interview with Rand Paul earlier this week on Fox and Paul basically stated this incident would do nothing more than elevate Trump's status. I tend to agree with this. Most would agree Trump is certainly divisive and I've read from several on this board like myself who simply couldn't vote for him and instead voted 3rd party in the prior elections. I'd like to see a little more media coverage on Fox and discussion in general around other candidates and perhaps the upcoming midterms vs the continued focus on Trump.
                          Shocker fan for life after witnessing my first game in person, the 80-74 win over the #12 Creighton Bluejays at the Kansas Coliseum.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Trump is an asshole for sure, but he's no more divisive than Obama, or the Biden outfit that we have now

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Ta Town Shocker View Post
                              I'm not trying to defend the left at all. From what little I've read about Garland on the WSJ, he's nothing but scum. I come to this board to seek out objective opinions and thoroughly enjoy the content from most threads, regardless of whether or not I agree with every post. I frequently hit the like button on many posts with differing viewpoints. I'm not a Trump supporter. I simply don't like the guy. He's had his fair share of personal moral shortcomings in my opinion. I went to listen to him when he was campaigning in Wichita and wasn't impressed with his speech in the least. My view is he's nothing more than a media whore who used the attention to propel himself into the presidency.
                              This I agree with.

                              I don't like Trump either. I don't agree with much of what he says. I don't trust him. I do think most of his policies as President have been on the money (so he's better than the Democrat alternative), and he is willing to "fight" the radical left, which even the moderate Democrats (which I don't see any of them speaking up against their left flank of Socialists and Green Energy Extremists ) who have lit a match to inflation. When Bernie and Biden agree on almost everything, it proves that the Democrat party is absolutely crazy. Also, Biden and illegal immigration is going to cause problems down the road to ever get a good immigration bill (they are continuing Trump's Wall in Arizona because Biden is trying to help Kelly get re-elected, but he refuses to budge anywhere else).

                              Suffice it to say that Biden and the Democrats are wrong on almost everything.

                              Originally posted by Ta Town Shocker View Post
                              That said, I feel there is quite a bit of blind support for Trump in this thread and not calling you out specifically. I didn't see the op but it appears you called out a piece of disinformation earlier.
                              I don't agree with this.

                              I see very little evidence that there is blind support for Trump on this board (I think there are people who have lost it in the public and would support him no matter what, but that is also true of antifa, etc.). I just don't trust the FBI Leadership/DOJ to do the right thing when it comes to Trump. It is concerning that they seem often to be an arm of the Democrat Party. There has been dis-information being presented by the media because there is no evidence that Trump was treated like Clinton who had a server in her basement and destroyed the Russian collusion e-mails (among other illegal e-mails) on it, and no raid was done, etc. We need the affadavits that are sealed that will show the "proof" or "lack of proof" for the raid on Mar a lago.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I don't think there's really "blind support" for Trump on this board. I won't argue that there isn't some out there in the cyber world, mostly amongst kooks and bots but be that as it may.......


                                I do think there is "blind support" (I use that term only for convenience) to defend the attacks against conservatives especially when it emanates from a press corps that takes their marching orders from DC.

                                Trump was the first to really take on the establishment, albeit with the tact of an elephant. He fought the fight that most don't care to even broach.


                                The fact that so many (on both sides, but let's face the facts, it's much worse on the Dem side and mostly so in the press) attach everyone in a political party with the most obtuse negative they can find is why things are the way they are today.....divisive and contentious. The only group "winning" is the political elite. The rest of us are losing. DC must be defanged or I fear this will not end peacefully.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X