Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Big Tech Cancel Culture

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post
    Ron Paul had his ability to access his FB page pulled this morning. No explanations. No warnings. No anything.

    Ron freaking Paul. Anyone claiming they're only targeting violence and threats of violence or calls for violence are lying to themselves
    Wow. Has it been restored?
    Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post

      Wow. Has it been restored?
      Appears that it took a couple of days, but he is back. Though I wouldn't be surprised to see him get silenced down the road as he's obviously not a fan of people silencing critics just because they disagree, and he's not going to not talk about.
      Infinity Art Glass - Fantastic local artist and Shocker fan
      RIP Guy Always A Shocker
      Carpenter Place - A blessing to many young girls/women
      ICT S.O.S - Great local cause fighting against human trafficking
      Wartick Insurance Agency - Saved me money with more coverage.
      Save Shocker Sports - A rallying cry

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by SubGod22 View Post

        Appears that it took a couple of days, but he is back. Though I wouldn't be surprised to see him get silenced down the road as he's obviously not a fan of people silencing critics just because they disagree, and he's not going to not talk about.
        Right.
        Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

        Comment


        • #19
          An update to an article from reason.com says,

          UPDATE: In an email on Monday night, a Facebook spokesperson told Reason that it had mistakenly locked former Rep. Ron Paul's page. "While there were never any restrictions on Ron Paul's page, we restricted one admin's ability to post by mistake. We have corrected the error."

          Comment


          • #20
            According to the video, taken by a Twitter executive, It sounds like Twitter and Jack Dorsey may be locking more people out in the future instead of unlocking them.

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post
              An update to an article from reason.com says,
              Yes, but as you say, that was from reason.com. What does unjustifiable.com have to say about it?
              Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post

                Yes, but as you say, that was from reason.com. What does unjustifiable.com have to say about it?
                Same thing as becauseIsaidso.com

                Comment


                • #23
                  I saw Zachary Voorhies being interviewed on a television program. Voorhies is a former Google executive who said that Google has made it’s search algorithms to shut out Conservative thought. When a person does a google search, the search tends to shut out Conservative viewpoints. He said that through company e-mails, this was made clear and that when the CEO testified before Congress, he put on a good show but lied, dodged, and avoided direct questions from Senators regarding whether tGoogle does that and how it is done. I think we already knew this but he Voorhies was a whistleblower who quit the company because of what they were doing and because of the climate inside, he couldn’t continue to work there.

                  Former Google employee Zachary Vorhies has released nearly 1,000 documents which he says is evidence of the search giant's anti-conservative bias on the platform.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Shockm View Post
                    https://www.foxnews.com/media/twitte...than-trump-ban

                    Twitter 'whistleblower' leaks video of Dorsey telling staff actions will be 'much bigger' than Trump ban

                    Dorsey, who recently addressed the controversy over his company's decision to permanently suspend the president, told staff in a virtual meeting that Twitter will do a "full retro" that will "take some time," but drew focus to the platform's former most high-profile account.

                    TWITTER CEO JACK DORSEY DEFENDS TRUMP BAN, BUT ADMITS COMPANY'S POWER SETS 'DANGEROUS' PRECEDENT


                    TWITTER BANS TRUMP, BUT IRANIAN AYATOLLAH, LOUIS FARRAKHAN, CHINESE PROPAGANDISTS STILL ACTIVE
                    OK, so everyone laughs at the Ayatollah (at least in America), everyone thinks Louis Farrakhan is a nut, so I'll give you that one.

                    But when was the last time the Ayatollah, Farrakhan or Chinese propagandists repeated lies countless times (like the Beverly Hillbillies (Trump family) and his friends) and started a full-blown riot at the capitol complex?

                    Some threats are more dangerous than others. Some people (who ought to behave responsibility, given the burden of governing) who have tremendous reach and use it to promote discredited lies and incite riots are more dangerous than others.

                    Parler, I'm sure, will be back up in time. You can go over there. They do a great job of protecting your personal data. If you don't believe me, go ask all the people who will be convicted of participating in the insurrection who thought their uploaded home movies would have geolocation scrubbed so as to prevent identifying their location or the ones who spoke online about shooting people who had their personal information compromised because their data wasn't protected by Parler.

                    Those folks will soon (if they don't already) have a criminal record. All because Parler 'protected' their data.

                    WWTTTD? (What would #Tedthetraitor do?) Probably whine a whole lot. He's really good at doing that when he's not trying to disenfranchise people's votes.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan View Post

                      OK, so everyone laughs at the Ayatollah (at least in America), everyone thinks Louis Farrakhan is a nut, so I'll give you that one.

                      But when was the last time the Ayatollah, Farrakhan or Chinese propagandists repeated lies countless times (like the Beverly Hillbillies (Trump family) and his friends) and started a full-blown riot at the capitol complex?

                      Some threats are more dangerous than others. Some people (who ought to behave responsibility, given the burden of governing) who have tremendous reach and use it to promote discredited lies and incite riots are more dangerous than others.

                      Parler, I'm sure, will be back up in time. You can go over there. They do a great job of protecting your personal data. If you don't believe me, go ask all the people who will be convicted of participating in the insurrection who thought their uploaded home movies would have geolocation scrubbed so as to prevent identifying their location or the ones who spoke online about shooting people who had their personal information compromised because their data wasn't protected by Parler.

                      Those folks will soon (if they don't already) have a criminal record. All because Parler 'protected' their data.

                      WWTTTD? (What would #Tedthetraitor do?) Probably whine a whole lot. He's really good at doing that when he's not trying to disenfranchise people's votes.
                      It’s not incitement if they were already breaching the Capitol before the words were spoken.
                      Livin the dream

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by revenge_of_shocka_khan View Post
                        But when was the last time the Ayatollah, Farrakhan or Chinese propagandists repeated lies countless times ... and started a full-blown riot at the capitol complex?
                        Right?! I mean not even Hitler, Nero, or Genghis Kahn's propagandists lied enough to start a full-blown riot at the Capitol Complex!

                        Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Kung Wu View Post

                          Right?! I mean not even Hitler, Nero, or Genghis Kahn's propagandists lied enough to start a full-blown riot at the Capitol Complex!
                          If this was Jeopardy, I'd say Hitler propagandists for 100 and the answer is "Who were called the Brown Shirts!"

                          The Brown Shirts may have murdered up to 1000 people in Nazi Germany by the time they had taken power.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Shockm View Post

                            If this was Jeopardy, I'd say Hitler propagandists for 100 and the answer is "Who were called the Brown Shirts!"

                            The Brown Shirts may have murdered up to 1000 people in Nazi Germany by the time they had taken power.
                            But they NEVER started a riot at the Capitol Complex!
                            Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Twitter is a slime bag organization. It will remove Conservatives for a meme but refuses to remove sexual porn trafficking material that was done when the Vic was 13 years old. Twitter sued by survivor of Child Sexual Abuse. Twitter knowingly distributed child sex videos and refused to take them down

                              https://endsexualexploitation.org/ar...-exploitation/
                              Last edited by Shockm; February 1, 2021, 10:52 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by wufan View Post

                                It’s not incitement if they were already breaching the Capitol before the words were spoken.
                                And now information has come out that even AOC heard something was going to happen 6 days prior. The capital police requested national guard assistance 6 times starting 1 week before the inauguration, but we're refused each time. Guess who is in charge of these things at the Capitol? That would be Nancy Pelosi. Was she the one that refused, I don't know. But the FBI informed some in congress of the planned attacks.
                                I don't understand why anyone would refuse reinforcement for the police knowing this was going to happen.
                                If it was for political gain, that person should be burned at the stake. And I don't care what political party it was.
                                I have absolutely no trust in anything a demo says anymore. Poor Cold sounds like one of our indoctrinated products of our public school systems. So sad

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X