Right, "Maybe there are performance differences, and that is a compelling reason ...", is quite different than "There are performance differences, and this is a compelling reason ...".
What data did you put forth to show that a male has become a female? There is no such data in existence, because there is no such medical technique known to convert a male into a female. It doesn't exist. The only medical techniques that exist are body modifications to make a male LOOK like a female, and drugs to make your hormone levels somewhat look like a females. Neither of which make you female.
THAT's the data that needs to exist.
Saying there is data to show that a man's body can be modified enough to compete with a female is obvious. We could simply remove some muscle tissue and slow him down or make him weaker, but I can just as easily show we can do the same thing to an adult and make him about the same strength as a 10 year old. We dont find that argument compelling for obvious reasons -- yet its practically the argument you are making.
It is okay for someone to claim to be what they are not.
It is okay for someone to modify their body to look like something they are not.
It is okay for someone to modify their body to reduce performance in sports.
It is not okay for someone to claim to be what they are not, modify their body to look like something they are not, take drugs to reduce performance to make it appear as though they are something they are not, and then assert the original _provably false_ claim to infringe on others.
Falsely competing in a fair competition by claiming you are something you are not, is infringing on others.
CeCe is a male, not a female.
What data did you put forth to show that a male has become a female? There is no such data in existence, because there is no such medical technique known to convert a male into a female. It doesn't exist. The only medical techniques that exist are body modifications to make a male LOOK like a female, and drugs to make your hormone levels somewhat look like a females. Neither of which make you female.
THAT's the data that needs to exist.
Saying there is data to show that a man's body can be modified enough to compete with a female is obvious. We could simply remove some muscle tissue and slow him down or make him weaker, but I can just as easily show we can do the same thing to an adult and make him about the same strength as a 10 year old. We dont find that argument compelling for obvious reasons -- yet its practically the argument you are making.
It is okay for someone to claim to be what they are not.
It is okay for someone to modify their body to look like something they are not.
It is okay for someone to modify their body to reduce performance in sports.
It is not okay for someone to claim to be what they are not, modify their body to look like something they are not, take drugs to reduce performance to make it appear as though they are something they are not, and then assert the original _provably false_ claim to infringe on others.
Falsely competing in a fair competition by claiming you are something you are not, is infringing on others.
CeCe is a male, not a female.
Comment