One of the things that really irked me was his use of the word "patriotic". When I think of a "patriot", I think of the revolutionaries that went against popular opinion and fought for freedom from tyranny. Yet, Biden thinks that being a willing subject of tyranny is "patriotic". Sorry, but that is a downright scary concept.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Paying more taxes is patriotic!
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by WuzeeOriginally posted by MaggieOriginally posted by WuzeeOriginally posted by ABCOriginally posted by WuzeeOriginally posted by ABCThat's fine, but do you support these higher taxes b/c the Federal Govt needs the revenue or b/c you want to redistribute wealth?
I want all Americans to shoulder future tax burdens in a way that is fair and appropriate. I don't care if we're raising $700 billion or $70. I support a graduated tax, because it's clear to me that if I have $10 and you have $100, a 10 percent tax has very different consequences in our real life economics. A flat tax does not result in an equal burden.
I am a capitalist. I do not begrudge people reaping financial rewards for taking risk. One of my biggest problems with Wichitans in general is that they tend to frown on big ideas because somebody might make a dollar on the project. However, I do have problems with people reaping financial rewards in a fixed game, where performance and compensation have no relationship, where risk is unnaturally supressed, and where special interests and lobbyists set the agenda before the public good.
I would include in that fixed game exploding corporate salaries, all manner of corporate welfare and mindless deregulation, which is clearly the root cause of the crisis right now.
I also believe that closing the income gap between the rich and poor would be a positive move for our economy. I don't buy that a reasonable tax increase (tax break rollback) will have any chilling effect on the spending habits of those making more than $250,000 a year.
It's time for the pendulum to swing back the other way.
As Maggie points out, "mindless deregulation" is not the cause of today's financial mess.
Years before Phil Gramm was a McCain campaign adviser and a lobbyist for a Swiss bank at the center of the housing credit crisis, he pulled a sly maneuver in the Senate that helped create today's subprime meltdown.
oh ... and I guess to prove I'm right I need to say something inane.
"Now the schooling endeth! Go unto your homes and weep at your inadequacies!"
As for the rest: I've stated my position. You're not ignored, you just don't accept the answer.
P.S. Your answer doesn't address the root of the problem.
Comment
-
David Brooks has a very good column in today's Eagle.
I have yet to read much about how deregulation caused this, outside of Obama talking points.
"In the first place, the idea that our problems stem from light regulation and could be solved by more regulation doesn't fit all the facts. The current financial crisis is centered on highly regulated investment banks, while lightly regulated hedge funds are not doing so badly."
Comment
-
Originally posted by IxiahOriginally posted by RoyalShock
No more involvement in education.
Comment
Comment