Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
This won't happen at the big corporations
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by 1979Shocker View Post"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
-John Wooden
-
In 2013 the average Fortune 500 CEO made 380 times the average employee. CEO: $12,300,000 or $5,913.46/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $32,368.42 or $15.56/hour
In 2014 this number fell to 296 times the average employee. CEO: $15,200,000 or $7,307.69/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $52,100 or $25.05/hour
I would like to see the data set as there appears to be some rounding assumptions in the calculations. Regardless of the data set one thing is for certain that in 1980 the average CEO made 40 times the average employee and it is now significantly greater.“Losers Average Losers.” ― Paul Tudor Jones
Comment
-
Originally posted by DUShock View PostIn 2013 the average Fortune 500 CEO made 380 times the average employee. CEO: $12,300,000 or $5,913.46/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $32,368.42 or $15.56/hour
In 2014 this number fell to 296 times the average employee. CEO: $15,200,000 or $7,307.69/hour Ave Non-Supervisory Employee: $52,100 or $25.05/hour
I would like to see the data set as there appears to be some rounding assumptions in the calculations. Regardless of the data set one thing is for certain that in 1980 the average CEO made 40 times the average employee and it is now significantly greater.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wu_shizzle View PostI'll admit I didn't read the article, but is he giving up stock options or just salary?
Comment
-
Originally posted by 1979Shocker View PostThat link only included a video. Here is a New York Times article on it, but I don't know if it mentioned stock options. I only glanced through it.
http://www.nytimes.<br /> <br /> <...year.html?_r=0
From the article:
As Mr. Kahneman has explained it, income above the threshold doesn’t buy happiness, but a lack of money can deprive you of it.Kansas is Flat. The Earth is Not!!
Comment
-
I read this article yesterday. It's a great read, and there's no reason to be skeptical. Just read it.
The CEO started the company in 2004 when he was 19 and now makes about $1,000,000 per year. He's going to reduce his own salary to $70,000 and raise the minimum that anyone in his company earns to $70,000. Obviously he's probably stashed away plenty, so he won't feel the effects of the lost $900,000+ for at least a year. He seems to be super financially conservative, so his own personal expenses are probably not extraordinary.
It's an interesting experiment. I bet he gets a LOT of job applicants from here on out. :)Kung Wu say, man who read woman like book, prefer braille!
Comment
-
Originally posted by SHOCKvalue View PostI'd say any study that has average worker salary go from $32K to $52K in a single year suffers from something critically amiss.
The CEO pool is the top 50 by sales in one instance (big bonus year) versus the 350 highest earners in another (again probably big bonuses).
In one instance, the estimate was put together by a left leaning think tank (bias) and in the other by a union lobbying group (bias). In both instances, the employee bonuses (probably 5% average) and the benefits (probably 20-30% average) are left out, causing a huge skew which would drop the actual difference (along with stocks exercised removed) down to about 100 times the average employee earnings. When you look at the average CEO (not the wealthiest) in an average year (where bonuses are minimum) you are probably looking at an average earnings of 10 times the earnings of all employees, and 20-25 times that of a union worker.
Also, they are comparing CEOs of the best company's versus average national information. Who's to say that these company's don't pay great?Last edited by wufan; April 19, 2015, 10:28 AM.Livin the dream
Comment
-
Is there more to the story?
"Don't measure yourself by what you have accomplished, but by what you should accomplish with your ability."
-John Wooden
Comment
Comment